In a discussion on wPolsce.pl, Michał Jach, a member of parliament affiliated with Law and Justice who chairs the parliamentary defense committee, addressed the Wagner Group threat and touched on the referendum topic concerning the border dam with Belarus.
Maciej Wolny, serving as guest editor, commented on the arrest of two Russians accused of spreading Wagner Group propaganda in Warsaw and Kraków.
Additionally, observers noted that the case highlights the seriousness of the security situation in Poland while also signaling the effectiveness of the country’s intelligence and security services. It would be short-sighted to assume Russia has no covert activities in Poland. The country is increasingly seen as a target for Russian intelligence operations. In the months leading up to the arrests, opposition voices questioned Poland’s defensive actions and the work of its services. In this tense security climate, the performance of Polish intelligence is welcomed as essential.
The discussion then moved to broader questions about the army and command structures. President Andrzej Duda, in a different interview, suggested that reforms to the army command could be on the horizon. Observers noted that the current configurations for commanding the armed forces, including a 2014 setup developed under a former commander and a security chief, produced friction and inefficiencies. Some improvements have been attributed to Minister Antoni Macierewicz, but the armed forces are undergoing both qualitative and quantitative changes as the eastern border experiences ongoing pressures. The aim is to align the command framework with contemporary realities, a shift that has accelerated over the past six to eight years and is likely to continue, including a strategic emphasis toward the east.
The parliamentary discussion reflected a belief that these reforms are necessary for national resilience.
“This is a threat to the existential security of Poles”
Michał Jach pointed to the fourth referendum question, regarding a border dam with Belarus.
The government, acting with a practical approach, advanced the border dam project as a safeguard against potential threats. While opponents and some political groups voiced strong criticisms at the time, supporters argued that the measure was necessary given ongoing risks. Jach noted that if key opposition figures eventually recognize the stakes but remain silent, that would be regrettable. Yet voices continue to argue for dismantling the dam, a move he believes would undermine Poland’s existential security. He framed the dam as a clear referendum issue: should the public weigh in decisively in favor, future leaders would likely hesitate to remove the barrier, even if the governing party changes hands.
The discussion then shifted to the meaning of a parade planned for the Day of the Polish Army, focusing on the public message it sends about national history and military strength.
Above all, the event commemorates the decisive victory of 1920, a source of national pride. It also serves as a public demonstration of the armed forces, illustrating to citizens how tax funds are invested and showing the presence of Allied forces to reinforce NATO unity and the promise that the Alliance stands firm in defense of every member.
The implications, according to the discussion, point to a broader strategic posture that aligns Poland with its regional partners and reinforces regional security commitments.
The subject of ongoing regional security was highlighted as part of a wider conversation about deterrence and resilience in the face of external pressure.
READ ALSO:
– Poland’s security concerns were noted by observers who questioned the approach to building a real barrier on the border with Belarus. This topic has generated debate about how best to balance openness with protection of national sovereignty. The discussion also touches on how political leadership communicates risk and strategy to the public.
– A broader examination contrasted dismissive political rhetoric with a measured assessment of security needs. The central question remains whether Wagner Group activity constitutes a credible threat and how Poland should respond within its legal and international obligations.
Source: wPolityce