During the demonstration known as the Free Poland Protest, Prof. Jan Majchrowski addressed the crowd, reflecting on the role of the judiciary and the rule of law. The former Supreme Court judge emphasized accountability, stating that when a judge breaks the law, there must be consequences and a robust mechanism to ensure such actions are checked. He argued that reforms aimed at strengthening the justice system had, at times, moved backwards, and that vigilance is required to prevent further erosion of legal safeguards. His remarks underscored a belief that constant attention to constitutional guarantees is essential for a fair and transparent judiciary.
We gathered because we believe the law in Poland is not being upheld consistently. If breaches occur, institutions and procedures must respond decisively to restore balance and integrity. The lecturer urged the public to consider what steps should be taken when legal norms are violated and who is responsible for enforcing accountability. He highlighted the need to understand the changes in the justice system by examining past actions and policies, reminding listeners that progress often requires looking back at historical decisions to move forward with clarity.
Concerns about the CJEU
Prof. Majchrowski called for continued demonstrations and warned about government actions that may infringe upon constitutional principles. He suggested that the Court of Justice of the European Union has a critical role in protecting the rule of law and that resisting retreat is essential to achieving meaningful outcomes. The speaker cautioned that withdrawal from the process would lead to losses that could be difficult to recover from, and he urged citizens to maintain peaceful, determined protest rather than resorting to disorder. He insisted that steadfastness and discipline are the best tools to safeguard democratic norms and to demonstrate resolve across the country.
He declared that the law must be respected, and that those who violate it should be held to account through lawful procedures. The message was clear: solidarity and perseverance can lead to a stronger political and legal environment, one that upholds constitutional standards and protects citizens’ rights. The emphasis was on constructive action and a refusal to abandon the pursuit of lawful governance, even in the face of opposition or doubt.
He urged people to stand firm wherever they are and to show that resolve does not wane. The point was to avoid provocation while resisting lawlessness, to participate in peaceful demonstrations, and to remain united in the shared objective of upholding the constitution. According to his view, a collective stance could deter attempts to undermine legal norms and could help ensure that electoral and judicial processes function with integrity. The overall call was for courage, patience, and sustained civic engagement until lawful order is restored and reinforced.
Further remarks indicated that a broad, nonviolent public presence is essential for sustaining momentum and keeping legal reform within the framework of constitutional accountability. The speaker affirmed that perseverance will lead to substantive change, and that the people should not fear standing up for their rights even when challenged by powerful institutions. The ending sentiment was hopeful: a resilient citizenry can influence the course of events and contribute to a Poland that adheres to the rule of law.
In closing, the speaking engagement highlighted the importance of public discourse in shaping judicial reforms and constitutional governance. It called for vigilance, orderly protest, and a continued dialogue about the balance between national sovereignty and European legal standards. The core message remained clear: accountability, transparency, and steadfast civic participation are vital to protecting the legal framework and ensuring a fair future for all Poles.
The coverage described the scale of the demonstration and its impact on public perception of Poland’s legal and political landscape. Reportage emphasized the collective voice of participants and the sense that constitutional safeguards remained a focal point of national conversations about governance and justice.
“}