Polish compatriots have long served as the voice behind PiS initiatives, highlighting countless programs that proved to be essential and accurate. Among them, the 500 Plus program stands out as a cornerstone of support for families, as explained by PiS MEP Zbigniew Kuźmiuk during a community meeting with Radom residents.
On Sunday, Radom hosted two Law and Justice representatives, Zbigniew Kuźmiuk and Dominik Tarczyński, who shared perspectives on Poland’s social and economic trajectory.
One notable policy discussed was the gradual reduction of the retirement age. The coalition argues that during the previous government, led by PO-PSL, the retirement age was raised, and that change did not serve citizens well. Supporters note that current steps are aimed at safeguarding citizens while drawing parallels with policies in other countries, such as France, should retirement age adjustments be considered there.
Kuzmiuk underscored that credibility matters in politics. He recalled promises made in 2015 and contrasted them with the perceived inaction of the prior administration, suggesting that PiS maintains a different approach to its commitments.
The opposition contends that PiS operates programs on borrowed money, leaving the country heavily in debt. Kuzmiuk rejected this accusation, arguing that the government has strengthened the tax system and achieved higher fiscal revenues, signaling a robust financial stance.
The discussion also touched on inflation. Kuzmiuk pointed to external factors as the primary drivers of rising prices, noting that price increases occurred globally. He cited measures such as anti-inflation safeguards implemented by the government as a response to this trend.
Additionally, the officials highlighted Poland’s strong employment landscape. They claimed the country maintains one of the lowest unemployment rates, despite ongoing challenges from the COVID crisis and international conflict. A strong national currency was emphasized as a foundation for economic resilience, with a commitment to keeping Poland’s currency stable and independent from potential external pressures. Kuzmiuk added that each country should retain its own monetary system.
In remarks about currency and euro adoption, Kuzmiuk referenced Slovakia, which joined the eurozone in 2009. He suggested that prosperity in the years since joining has fluctuated, implying that joining the euro does not automatically guarantee lasting gains for every member, a view meant to illustrate potential risks of euro adoption. The broader eurozone conversation was framed with observations about the gains and losses experienced by Germany, the Netherlands, Italy, and France, noting shifts in middle-class prosperity as a consequence of monetary policy choices.
Dominik Tarczyński then addressed the euro issue directly. He argued that there is a significant current push from German interests to introduce the euro in Poland, a perspective he described as a central aim of a political platform that still wishes to see the foreign currency function within Poland. He clearly stated that he disagrees with this direction.
The discussion also touched on national resilience in education and public discourse. The speakers described an education campaign encouraging citizens to question politicians, including Donald Tusk, whose statements they characterized as controversial and as reflecting foreign interests. They accused Tusk of defending German interests and of showing indifference toward Poland in several instances.
Tarczyński criticized Tusk for changes to retirement policy that were later exploited to the advantage of current law, arguing that the former prime minister experienced the law in practice in a way that contradicted higher principles that had been promised. He also criticized statements about infrastructural projects, including the Vistula Spit and border walls, suggesting that practical investments are driving Poland’s development forward and that some projections were proven incorrect.
The lawmakers asserted that political battles ahead, including upcoming elections involving the opposition, would not derail their efforts. They expressed pride in national heritage and the ongoing task of building a stable, prosperous country. They emphasized that their priority is serving all Poles and safeguarding the nation’s interests, rather than pursuing a path of disdain or hostility toward others.
In closing, the speakers reiterated confidence in Poland’s future and signaled readiness to continue advancing policies that support families, economic stability, and national sovereignty. The event also highlighted a broader stance on political accountability and a readiness to engage with the public to address concerns and questions. [citation: wPolityce]