In a session at the Sejm, Jarosław Kaczyński answered questions from journalists, focusing on the farmers’ protests and broader European policy issues. The leader of PiS expressed support for the farmers’ right to protest while outlining the political and economic stakes tied to the ongoing demonstrations across Poland.
Asked about the blockade actions organized by farmers nationwide, Kaczyński stated that the protests are justified. He added that if Ukraine joins the European Union, the concerns raised by farmers will have to be resolved in some manner as part of the evolving European framework.
The discussion then turned to potential consequences for European and particularly Polish agriculture in the event of Ukraine’s accession to the EU. He emphasized that this issue would require careful, separate consideration outside the immediate political discourse.
Additionally, Kaczyński reflected on the operations and history of the European Union. He criticized the approach of certain EU leaders, suggesting that their policies could have far-reaching, negative effects on Europe. His remarks framed the debate as one about ideological direction and the long-term impact on continental governance.
Mandates of Kamiński and Wąsik
On the matter of MPs Mariusz Kamiński and Maciej Wąsik, the PiS president underscored the importance of the Supreme Court’s disciplinary chamber. He argued that the integrity of the parliamentary process hinges on a functioning and properly constituted judiciary that can adjudicate disputes around MPs, conduct, and authority. The idea presented was that if the court does not fulfill its role, the Sejm loses a core part of its legitimacy.
When journalists pressed about whether Monika Pawłowska could assume Mariusz Kamiński’s mandate, the PiS president gave a firm response. He asserted that there is no free mandate, that the marshal must adhere to the law, and that those procedures should be interpreted in light of the Supreme Court Act. He insisted that the chamber of the Supreme Court vested with the authority to decide these cases has already issued clear decisions, and that there is no mechanism for appeal against them within the current legal framework.
The exchange highlighted a broader tension between parliamentary prerogatives, judicial oversight, and the enforcement of legal standards within the Polish political system. The dialogue reflected the party’s stance on accountability, the hierarchy of legal authority, and the role of the Sejm in relation to judicial governance.
Overall, the remarks touched on how domestic political debates intersect with EU-wide policies, the potential implications for agricultural sectors, and the ongoing discussion about the balance of power among lawmakers, the judiciary, and executive authorities. These themes underscore how leadership perspectives on governance, the rule of law, and regional integration shape public discourse in Poland and influence how officials respond to protests, legal challenges, and calls for reform.
In closing, commentators emphasized that the situation remains dynamic: farmers continue to mobilize, policy responses are being shaped at both national and European levels, and the interpretations of constitutional and judicial roles continue to influence the trajectory of political events in the country.