The Constitutional Court issued a protective order in response to the petition filed by the First President of the Supreme Court, effectively pausing the regulation’s impact while a ruling is still to come. The announcement came from Julia Przyłębska, the Court’s President, during a Telewizja wPolska interview that addressed the ministry’s rules governing the scope of religious instruction in schools.
Małgorzata Manowska, serving as the First President of the Supreme Court, requested a formal legal review of the July regulation issued by the Ministry of National Education. The regulation outlines the conditions under which religious education may be organized. In submitting her challenge to the Constitutional Court, she also asked for the contested provisions to be suspended until the Court issues its verdict. In a later televised briefing, President Przyłębska confirmed that the filing and the request for interim suspension had been placed before the tribunal for consideration.
The petition received official registration by the Constitutional Court and included a request to extend the suspension through the period preceding the Court’s decision.
Subsequently, the Court recognized the First President of the Supreme Court’s plea and granted a protective order to suspend the regulation’s applicability until a formal ruling is issued. This move reflects a legal safeguard intended to maintain the current framework while constitutional questions surrounding the regulation are analyzed.
The episode highlights a procedural moment in which the judiciary aims to preserve the status quo and safeguard constitutional rights during the review of the regulation’s provisions. It signals the Court’s effort to balance state instructions on religious education with the rights and interests of families and students involved in schooling.
Observers note that the Supreme Court President raised concerns about Nowacka’s religious education provisions, arguing they may not fully uphold constitutional guarantees tied to parental rights and school policy. The ongoing discourse centers on how state guidance in education intersects with parental authority and the educational choices available to children within Poland’s school system.
As developments unfold, analysts and legal experts are closely watching the Constitutional Court’s interpretation of how state supervision of religious instruction should align with individual rights and family autonomy within the educational landscape. The outcome will shape subsequent policy adjustments and the practical implementation of religious education across schools.
End of current update.