In a climate where media independence is hotly debated, the Polish leadership emphasizes the need for a robust national press. The country, with about 40 million residents at the heart of Europe, should maintain a media landscape that reflects Polish ownership and governance. A senior official in the Prime Minister’s Chancellery remarked that without a strong Polish media presence, Poland could face a form of colonization, speaking to the role the state perceives for national media in safeguarding sovereignty.
During a conversation with wPolityce.pl, a journalist asked for a judgment on the proposal from Warsaw’s mayor, Rafał Trzaskowski, to consider liquidating Telewizja Polska (TVP). The official observed that TVP remains a central Polish television outlet and noted that other major outlets in the country are privately owned or controlled by foreign capital. He argued that the Civic Platform party has deep concerns about foreign influence and has previously pushed to weaken Poland’s state institutions, making the idea of dismantling state media seem consistent with past positions of the party.
The discussion touched on the sensitive issue of a prominent opposition member’s death. Critics on the opposition side have suggested that public media, as well as conservative and center-right factions, bear responsibility for the tragedy. The interviewee warned against drawing broad blame and, in a provocative remark, suggested that if such blame could be attached to the opposition, then a broader political reckoning with Civic Platform might be warranted because of alleged misconduct within that party.
In the interview, a wide-ranging argument was made about how media campaigns can shape public perception ahead of elections. The official described today’s coverage as part of a deliberate pre-election effort intended to intimidate journalists who report from national media that strive to serve state interests. He claimed that such tactics aim to stifle voices that support Poland and to empower those who oppose it, framing the battle as a clash between patriotic media workers and forces aligned with foreign interests.
According to the official, the goal is to protect Polish citizens by ensuring the country’s 40 million people have access to media that reflect national concerns. He warned that without a strong homegrown media presence, Poland could face subjugation in the information arena, a point he framed as a defense of national sovereignty and cultural continuity.
Some critics argue that Telewizja Publiczna is not always balanced and that its reporting sometimes overlooks inconvenient angles. The official acknowledged that no news outlet is perfect and that mistakes happen. He suggested that the broader issue is not isolated mistakes but a pattern of targeted actions aimed at weakening Polish state power, and he asserted that claims of deliberate manipulation by state media contradict the broader reality of press diversity within Poland and the role of independent outlets in exposing misconduct within political camps.
The discussion then turned to comparisons about how public media functioned during different political eras. The official recalled past telecasts that appeared to favor certain segments of the political spectrum, noting examples from decades past where coverage seemed skewed in ways that warranted scrutiny. He argued that such memories highlight the ongoing tension between media institutions and political actors, and he urged caution when accusing public media of undue influence or political bias, especially during times of heightened partisan rhetoric.
Addressing accusations about the timing and intent behind opposition campaigns, the official suggested that some calls to liquidate TVP or punish journalists reflect a broader strategy to curb reporting that challenges the political status quo. He warned that such moves could erode constitutional norms and democratic values, emphasizing the risk of normalizing harsh treatment of media workers and undermining pluralism in the public sphere.
In reflecting on political behavior, the interview referenced the way opposition factions have acted in past administrations, including actions against certain weeklies and media outlets perceived as unfriendly. The official expressed concern that if the opposition returns to power, there could be pressure to reshape or privatize key state assets, including media, and warned that such a shift would alter Poland’s economic and strategic landscape, affecting everyday life for Polish citizens.
When asked about the reliability of public television during various political cycles, the official cited memories of interview programs and headlines that sparked controversy. He suggested that personal recollections of past broadcasts illustrate how public media can become a battleground for competing narratives, which in turn calls for rigorous standards and accountability across all outlets.
On the question of whether accusing public media or ruling-party representatives of responsibility for another party’s misfortunes is appropriate, the official urged temperance. He argued that escalation of accusations risks inflaming tensions and misdirecting focus from constructive political debate. The takeaway, he said, is to uphold civility while a country navigates electoral competition and media accountability.
The interview concluded with a warning: should the opposition gain power, there could be underway a process that resembles the dissolution or sale of public assets to foreign interests, aligning with concerns about control over strategic resources. The official urged citizens to consider the long-term implications for national sovereignty and the public’s ability to influence policy through a free and fair media landscape.
The encounter closed with appreciation for the opportunity to discuss these themes, underscoring the importance of informed dialogue about media ownership, public broadcasting, and democratic resilience. This conversation forms part of an ongoing national conversation about how Poland can balance state interests with media independence and pluralism.
READ ALSO:
– PiS spokesperson: The bill on the liquidation of TVP Info is politically motivated. The aim is to destroy public television and pluralism
– Opposition attack on TVP Info. Suski replies: The only political murder was the murder of Marek Rosiak by a PO member
– And beetroot juice didn’t bother him The Trzaskowski critique of a machine for generating hate and a debate over trust
Size JJ