In a candid broadcast on Polsat News, Małgorzata Wassermann, a member of parliament from Law and Justice, argued that the justice system is deteriorating and in need of a comprehensive reform. She expressed that if she were to lead the ministry responsible for justice, all changes would be aligned with a clear, personal vision she outlined during the interview. The remarks came as she reflected on the current state of Poland’s legal framework and the direction she believes reforms should take.
Wassermann, a trained lawyer, told Marcin Fijołek that she was far from satisfied with how the Polish judiciary operates. She described the system as failing to function as it should and pointed to decisions that, in her view, lack coherence or accountability, leaving prosecutors and police frustrated when their efforts do not translate into proportionate outcomes in court.
According to her assessment, some prosecutors feel discouraged when they collaborate with law enforcement, only to see suspects released without the appropriate measures being applied. She suggested that this disconnect undermines the work of those who devote themselves to pursuing justice and upholding the law.
Wassermann also highlighted what she sees as a politicization of the judiciary in Poland, with a large portion of judges taking sides in broad political disputes. She warned that such involvement could create unacceptable pressure and undermine the impartiality expected of judges, calling for a genuine and thorough reform of the judiciary to restore trust in the system.
She argued that judges sometimes appear more engaged in political contention than in delivering fair justice, asserting that this trend pressures the judiciary and obstructs its ability to maintain neutrality. The PiS deputy emphasized the need for a judiciary that can operate independently of political factions and that the rule of law can be applied consistently across cases.
Wassermann indicated that the current political climate has contributed to a perception that the power-sharing arrangement in Poland should be subject to renewed scrutiny and that those in control should be able to shape policy without undue obstruction. She noted that the reform process must be carried out with careful judgment and accountability, while denying that any concrete plan had been proposed at that moment.
The Krakow-based representative acknowledged the concerns raised by Justice Minister Zbigniew Ziobro, who argued that the reform efforts faced constant disruption. She left room for future decisions, saying that if given the chance to lead the justice portfolio, she would ensure alignment with her own strategic vision and governance approach, while stressing that no formal proposal was on the table at that time.
In a separate discussion, Wassermann spoke about the civic draft amendment to the abortion act. She stated that she voted against the proposal, describing it as harmful, and noted that her stance was shaped by her personal faith in tandem with her professional responsibilities as a government official. She explained that her opposition was rooted in concerns about societal division and heightened emotional currents in public life, as well as a belief that the government should focus on a broader agenda rather than engaging in contentious social issues.
As she elaborated, the parliamentarian stressed the importance of equal treatment for all people in Poland and suggested that the public discourse around sensitive topics like abortion should be handled with care to prevent further societal rifts. She indicated that the government and parliament have daily duties that demand practical, everyday focus rather than polarizing debates on moral questions. Her remarks reflected a broader belief that governance should prioritize stability and concrete solutions over rhetoric on divisive subjects.
Wassermann also commented on the overall approach to electoral programs, stressing that voters deserve clear, tangible proposals rather than rhetoric around issues such as religion, abortion, and euthanasia. She suggested that responsible governance should concentrate on policies with immediate, measurable impact rather than symbolic debates that do not address daily concerns faced by citizens.
In this context, the deputy underscored the need for pragmatic, outcome-oriented governance that concentrates on pressing problems facing Poland. Her remarks pointed toward a broader call for political leaders to deliver concrete plans that can be implemented efficiently, and to maintain focus on issues that affect everyday life for families and communities across the country.
These statements reflect Wassermann’s broader political stance and her conviction that the government should be results-driven, with a clear strategy for justice and social policy. They appear in the context of ongoing discussions about potential reforms and the role of the judiciary in Polish democracy, as well as the need to balance moral considerations with practical governance. The dialogue illustrates the tensions that often accompany policy reform in contemporary Poland, where public trust and institutional integrity are central to the reform agenda and its legitimacy in the eyes of voters and international observers alike.
— The remarks underscore a call for accountability, a demand for transparent reform, and a belief that governance must deliver real, concrete outcomes for the Polish people. The discussion also points to the broader political climate in which judges, lawmakers, and ministers navigate complex, high-stakes decisions that shape the legal and social landscape of the nation. (citation: wPolityce)