A development originating in Germany has drawn attention, though its veracity remains uncertain. A government spokesperson suggested that the citizens’ platform may obtain permission from Germany and the European People’s Party to present itself in the election campaign as a staunch critic of illegal immigration, according to a post on social media.
Will the Civic Platform position itself against illegal migration?
According to this account, the Civic Platform could receive clearance from Germany and its political family in the European Union to sharply challenge policies on illegal immigration. The claim implies that the party would receive information from Western neighbours to support this stance.
A report noted on social media that a signal from Germany, whether true or not, indicated that Platforma.org had been granted permission by the European People’s Party to frame its campaign as a forceful opposition to illegal immigration.
That message was attributed to Jablonski in a post.
Observers suggest that voters are increasingly reluctant to back a party perceived as aligned with external proposals, and that the Civic Platform risks shedding a central image of obedience to EU or German directions, a shift that could accompany an attempt to redefine itself within Polish political discourse.
– noted in the discussion.
“So that an independent Polish policy cannot be pursued”
A more decisive tone and sharper rhetoric have begun to surface in statements from Tusk and other Civic Platform figures, signaling emphasis on secure borders as the campaign heats up this weekend.
– stated the spokesperson. He adds that any permission would be limited to the election period.
The objective, as framed by critics, is to secure victory at any cost and to align quickly with proposals that some observers associate with Germany. If such alignment occurred, there were concerns voiced about possible steps including relocation arrangements after elections, reconsideration of the unanimity rule, and calls to reposition the EU toward centralized management with the European capital in Brussels and German influence in policy making. This scenario would be framed as preventing any future Polish government from pursuing an independent line without consent from Germany and its EU allies.
The concern is that such a trajectory would limit Poland’s autonomy in formulating its own policy directions.
But there is a strong counterclaim: many Poles would resist the idea of politicians seeking permission from abroad, and they may not be easily persuaded.
– commented on the matter, referencing a political trajectory under consideration.
READ ALSO:
– A political ally of Tusk challenges Poland again. Weber on television: “Let’s exclude those who misrepresent Poland and Hungary”
– Giorgia Meloni was asked about Poland and Hungary at the EU summit. “I never lose faith in those who defend their national interests”
– OUR INTERVIEW. A Karski: there is concern about a migration wave of ethnic Germans toward Poland, potentially a consequence of migration policy decisions
– ONLY HERE. Relocation of migrants. Legutko: EU rules are not binding today, suggesting coercion
– EU summit ends without a final plan on migrant relocation. What does this mean? Poland presented a simple, rational plan; this is not the moment for EU experiments
– The head of government after the EU summit: Relocation encourages smugglers. The hope is for a sober Europe to wake up and rethink policies
yes/Twitter
Source: wPolityce