In a televised exchange, Ryszard Petru reiterated his invitation for Sławomir Mentzen to join an election debate. He argued that Konfederacja would face a substantive test on economic policy and suggested the party draws younger voters, while warning of potential coalitions after the vote that could be described as black-brown in character. This framing appears in coverage on Polsat NEWS’s Graffiti program. (Source: wPolityce)
Further updates noted that The Third Way unveiled its slogan, promising: “Enough fighting, let’s go.” Earlier disclosures confirmed that Dziambor and Petru are among the parliamentary candidates. (Source: wPolityce)
Petru’s Warning about a Black-Brown Formation
Petru, who once led Nowoczesna, characterized Konfederacja as promoting a program he views as deceptive. He contends that several points in their platform are false and that the party itself is aware of this. He suggested there is a leaning toward cooperation with PiS, implying that denials may mask a real intent. (Source: wPolityce)
He asserted that a bloc he calls “black-brown” could emerge, explaining that the color symbolism ties to PiS and Konfederacja respectively. He framed this as an alliance shaped by anti-abortion and anti-Ukrainian sentiments, arguing that such positions are often hidden beneath liberal rhetoric. (Source: wPolityce)
Debate with Mentzen
Petru once again invited Sławomir Mentzen to participate in a public debate. His stance was clear: avoiding the confrontation would signal that something needed to be hidden. He pressed Mentzen directly, asking what he might be concealing. (Source: wPolityce)
Petru and the Poland 2050 Initiative
In another move, Petru announced an intention to align with the Poland 2050 party, expressing a desire to become a formal member. He described the broader electoral moment as one where the party’s slogan, The Third Way, resonated with voters worn out by argument and dispute. (Source: wPolityce)
The broader question, he noted, concerned what lies ahead beyond the immediate campaign. The appeal of The Third Way’s message was seen as meeting a mood among many Poles seeking a change in tone and priorities. (Source: wPolityce)
Questions About Housing and Economic Policy
The discussion also touched on the so‑called Friendly Housing Estate program, a plan associated with PiS. Petru suggested that if the program aligns with the KPO framework, it could represent a step forward in housing insulation projects funded through European resources. He urged transparency on funding—specifically whether Brussels money would arrive through the KPO and, if not, where the necessary funds would come from after years of heavy borrowing. He framed the funding issue as a test of ideological consistency versus practical execution. (Source: wPolityce)
Observers noted that this exchange aligns with ongoing debates over the Polish budget, cohesion funds, and the political calculations surrounding KPO, the Polish Recovery and Resilience Plan. Petru reminded audiences of the complexities involved in securing external funds and who bears responsibility for policy decisions. (Source: wPolityce)
Reports also referenced ongoing scrutiny of whether the government might secure KPO funds and under what terms. Critics have pointed to the longer arc of negotiations with Brussels and Berlin, while supporters argue that timely decisions could unlock critical investments. (Source: wPolityce)
The program closed with reflections on the broader political landscape and the measurable impact of policy proposals on Polish households and the economy. Petru offered his perspective on how different coalition possibilities could shape future governance and the lived reality of citizens. (Source: wPolityce)
kk/Polsat NEWS (Source: wPolityce)