A raid on the Independence March Association newsroom and the ongoing legal response
A few days earlier, members aligned with the Confederacy reportedly entered the headquarters of the March of Independence Association under the pretext of taking stock of assets to prevent depletion. In the aftermath, TVMN announced that it had received a report of criminal conduct connected to the incident.
According to TVMN, a formal complaint was filed with the prosecutor’s office alleging that Confederate politicians unlawfully entered the newsroom, interrupted ongoing journalistic work, and continued to use the station’s equipment along with journalists’ personal laptops stored on the premises. The broadcaster’s leadership emphasized that those responsible would face legal consequences for their actions.
In social media remarks, Robert Bąkiewicz, the president of TVMN, reiterated the party line that the newsroom space had been accessed without permission and that the sublease arrangement had been violated. He characterized the break-in as a serious breach of professional norms and stated that the case would be pursued to its full extent in the courts.
From TVMN’s account, the disputed office continues to be occupied without lawful authorization, and equipment belonging to the media operation, along with journalists’ private devices, remains in unauthorized possession. The broadcaster cited potential violations of criminal law and pledged steadfast attention to the matter as investigations proceed.
During a press briefing, TVMN executives connected the incident to broader concerns about press freedom and newsroom security. They pointed to instances at public events where individuals associated with the Confederation attempted to disrupt coverage. One representative described the conduct as a flagrant violation of professional standards, while another noted suspicions that private laptops were examined for material that could cast the party in a negative light. The statements underscored the perceived seriousness of the situation and called for accountability.
Additional remarks from TVMN editors indicated that the editorial team continues to report on related events, including coverage of a high-profile political clash at an agricultural forum. In that reporting, a deputy prime minister and agriculture minister was assailed during a protest that involved participants alleging misrepresentation by certain political actors. Journalists at TVMN maintained that some participants presented themselves as farmers when they were in fact engaged in other activities, a dynamic that raised questions about the authenticity of some public displays. The commentary signaled concerns about attempts to influence public perception through questionable associations and tactics.
As the situation unfolds, TVMN representatives expressed hope that law enforcement and the judiciary will address the matter promptly. They referenced press law protections and the need to safeguard journalistic secrecy as central to the ongoing process. The press service for TVMN reaffirmed the station’s commitment to transparent reporting and adherence to legal standards while pursuing accountability for any infringements on newsroom operations.
Observers note that the incident has sparked debate about the boundaries of political action and the responsibilities of public figures when it comes to media access. While officials insist that the actions taken were illegal, supporters of the accused parties may argue that the events warrant a closer examination of the tensions between political activism and press oversight. In any case, the case is moving through formal channels, and both media organizations and political actors are watching closely as the investigation continues and additional information becomes available.
In summary, the incident at the Independence March Association’s offices prompted a formal complaint, heightened concerns about newsroom security, and a broader discussion about how political interference intersects with media operations. The outcome will likely influence future relations between opposition-aligned groups and independent media, as well as set a precedent for how similar situations are handled under the applicable laws and journalistic codes of conduct.
tkwl/Twitter/TVMN press materials
READ ALSO: What is happening at the headquarters of the Association “Marsz Niepodległości”? The vice president writes about “inventory”; Bąkiewicz on “breaking in”
Source: internal media coverage