Reports circulating from unidentified sources indicate that Grigory Yavlinsky, the founder of the Yabloko party, has left Russia. One account mentions that the politician flew to London on a route that included a stopover in Dubai, though it did not disclose specific circumstances surrounding the trip.
In online commentary, Maxim Kruglov, who leads the Yabloko faction in the Moscow City Duma, suggested that Yavlinsky’s departure could be for personal reasons and not related to immigration. He estimated a return within a week or two, signaling no immediate plan to remain abroad indefinitely.
This development followed Yavlinsky’s recent public critique of Anatoly Chubais, the former head of Rosnano, who left Russia at the end of March. Yavlinsky described Chubais as having played a central role in shaping the current political system and labeled the move a serious error connected to the reforms and privatization processes that took place under his influence, as reported by Arguments and Facts.
Media coverage has noted that Chubais and his associates are under scrutiny for potential acts of corruption. Law enforcement officials reportedly interviewed witnesses and reviewed documents as part of ongoing checks, according to a source within the Russian security framework quoted by TASS. The source indicated that investigators are examining available materials for signs of criminal conduct, while keeping certain details confidential to aid the investigation.
What is known publicly is that officials did not release additional details at that time, citing investigative confidentiality. Earlier reporting from TASS indicated that Russian security services were reviewing information about hidden accounts allegedly held by Chubais, with connections to European banks. The reported sums were described as possibly reaching billions in foreign currency, prompting questions about legality and ownership of those funds.
Current reports place Chubais outside Russia, with some speculation that he may have traveled to Europe via Turkey in the wake of significant security operations related to Ukraine. He has, however, faced denials from supporters and representatives who emphasized that there have been no confirmed visits to certain countries and no private flight or overseas real estate holdings were verified. They noted that discussions with multiple universities in regions like Turkey and Israel had occurred, though specifics remain contested.
On another front, political appointments have continued to unfold. In a March statement, Vladimir Putin named Anatoly Chubais as Special Envoy for Relations with International Organizations, focusing on the Sustainable Development Goals. He also remained involved with some reform-oriented groups while stepping away from others, including the board positions at AFK Sistema and Elektrozavod, where shifts were noted in leadership roles and governance structures.
Meanwhile, Sergei Kulikov, who now heads Rosnano, directed internal questions to law enforcement in mid-April, asking for oversight over the agency’s activities during the Chubais era. He hinted at concerns about potential financial distress within the company, including signs of possible bankruptcy, prompting questions about future strategic direction for the agency and its projects.
Within the Russian political landscape, Kremlin officials have maintained a cautious stance. A spokesperson for the president emphasized that the Kremlin does not monitor every movement of Chubais, and suggested that anyone with inquiries should approach law enforcement channels. This stance has kept public focus on the ongoing developments surrounding Chubais and his associates, including the broader implications for governance and accountability in a volatile regional context.
As events continue to unfold, observers note that movements of prominent political figures may have reverberations for policy discussions and international relations. The situation remains fluid, with official statements emphasizing procedural restraint while independent voices seek clarity on accusations, movements, and the long-term impact on Russia’s political and economic reform trajectory. The public is left to await further confirmations and official clarifications about the legality and implications of the various actions reported in relation to Chubais, Yavlinsky, and other key figures involved in these high-profile developments.