The Colombian government and the National Liberation Army ELN have resumed dialogue after a period of tension in the peace talks, following criticisms from radicals who challenged the progress of negotiations. The update comes from official channels and is reflected in statements attributed to the negotiating teams through a joint communication, signaling a return to routine sessions for the peace process.
The groups stated that regular meetings of the negotiating committee have recommenced after taking note of critical remarks about the latest address by President Gustavo Petro. The dialogue participants emphasized that the discussions remain structured and continue to follow a formal process despite recent public strains.
There is growing coverage that both sides may aim to finalize a bilateral ceasefire during the current round of talks. Observers note that the possibility of a sustained pause in hostilities is a recurring objective that would accompany broader political negotiations, though several hurdles still stand in the way.
In recent days a declaration circulated within ANO indicated that the talks with the government are under stress. This development followed Petro’s public comments which suggested that some factions within the rebel movement appear to prioritize illicit funding streams over ideological commitments. The remarks have been perceived as provocative by the ELN and have fueled speculation about the mood of the negotiating teams.
The rebel side reportedly found the statements disrespectful to the process and to the participants involved. The incident has prompted renewed discussions about how to maintain mutual trust and incremental progress in the face of political rhetoric that can complicate diplomatic exchanges.
Historical context shows that a previous round of negotiations with the ELN, announced in February 2023 in Mexico, centered on ceasefire arrangements and confidence-building measures. After a period when a six month truce had been observed following Petro’s ascent to power, a broader agreement involving the government and several armed groups appeared within reach. However, later developments cast doubt on the rebels’ endorsement of the truce, underscoring the fragility that often accompanies talks with nonstate actors and the challenge of aligning timelines, priorities, and guarantees among multiple parties.