Legal Allegations and Public Health Campaigns In Valencia
In Spain, a legal dispute has emerged surrounding senior regional officials and the funding of activities linked to what has been described as a chemical sex practice. A criminal complaint was filed against two high-ranking figures within the Generalitat for alleged crimes against public health, with the claim that funds were used to support a person application to practice chemical sex. The public statement from the lawyers association outlines these charges, while the Generalitat maintains that the initiative was a sex education campaign aimed at minimizing associated risks.
The complaint is directed at Jesús Damián Martí, the director general of the Valencian Youth Institute, and Ofelia Gimeno, the Director of Public Health. It accuses them of financing a communication platform tied to chemical sex and of promoting this potentially dangerous activity among young residents of the Valencian Community through social media. The clarification from Fundeu-RAE, citing the Oxford English Dictionary, explains chemical sex as a sexual activity influenced by stimulants, often involving multiple partners, with substances such as methamphetamine or mephedrone. The term is sometimes used in Spanish literary translations to describe this phenomenon.
They also reported that the Christian Lawyers petition challenged the distribution of LGTBI reading materials within Castellón schools, opposing certain outreach materials. The public health directorate is said to have provided a grant to the Valencia Community’s Citizens’ Committee against AIDS, amounting to 5,496.43 euros, to execute a project described as a “Contacts app for men who have sex with men and users of chemical sex.” Regarding the Valencian Youth Institute, concerns were raised about a social media guide that included references to chemical sex and statements such as “Everything is fine as long as it is checked.” The organization claims posts were removed from Instagram about a month after publication, following media coverage that prompted a response.
Under the banner of public health, the issue has been framed as a dangerous mix of drugs, sex, and risk. The head of the Christian Lawyers team notes that taxes support a government action that could influence minors to use drugs, asserting that this constitutes a public health crime and warrants immediate disqualification of the involved officials. In contrast, the Generalitat presents a different narrative. They describe the campaign, led by IVAJ, as a harm-reduction effort designed to minimize risk among young people. The campaign’s guide, published by IVAJ, begins with an explicit caution: “the chemsex practice always carries certain risks,” and acknowledges that prohibitions do not deter individuals from engaging in it. To reduce harm, the guide offers practical considerations.
Among the recommendations cited in the campaign are several harm-reduction steps: obtaining information to understand effects, risks, and any potential interactions with other treatments; knowing the source of any supplied drugs to ensure a level of drug quality; setting prearranged limits and safe words to keep the experience controlled; fostering a safe environment with trusted companions who can provide care if needed. The overarching message concludes that a controlled approach can be safer, but consciousness disruption renders the activity unsafe.
Chemsex: Public Health, Policy, and Youth Education
The dialogue around chemsex involves contrasting perspectives. Proponents view harm-reduction campaigns as practical tools to protect youth and reduce health risks associated with drug use and sexual activity. Critics, including some Christian legal groups, argue that public funds diverted toward these efforts may promote risky behavior or normalize illegal drug use among minors. The tension between safety-focused education and concerns about moral and legal boundaries continues to shape policy discussions in the region.
Supporters of the Valencian public health approach contend that accurate information, transparent risk assessment, and clearly defined safety strategies empower young individuals to make informed decisions. The narrative emphasizes that information about potential effects, drug purity, safety planning, and the importance of defined boundaries can mitigate harm. They emphasize that a safe practice depends on continuous awareness and responsible conduct, though they acknowledge that risk cannot be completely eliminated.
Ultimately, the case underscores a broader question about how regions balance public health objectives with the protection of youth and the allocation of public resources. As authorities review both the legal arguments and the health guidelines, observers note the importance of evidence-based communication, careful monitoring of social media content, and ongoing dialogue with communities affected by these issues. The outcome of this dispute may have implications for how harm-reduction strategies are framed and funded in other autonomous communities.