The Bolivian armed forces moved to liberate a central square in La Paz where key government buildings are situated. The operation marked a turning point in the capital’s long-standing power dynamics, drawing the nation’s attention to the fate of the government complex at Murillo Square and the surrounding streets that have long hosted political demonstrations and official proceedings. As the day unfolded, reporters described stages of the operation that included the withdrawal of soldiers and armored vehicles that had previously positioned themselves near the square, signaling a potential de-escalation after tense hours of confrontation.
Among the notable figures on the scene was General Juan José Zúñiga, who previously led the nation’s army during the unfolding events. Footage and on-the-ground observations indicated that he exited the central area as part of the evolving command changes reported by multiple outlets. The movements of uniformed personnel, along with support units, suggested a broader shift in leadership and a recalibration of the armed forces’ role in stabilizing the capital during a period of constitutional scrutiny.
In a televised address to the nation, President Luis Arce announced that he had assumed command of the armed forces and urged General Zúñiga to adhere to all lawful orders. The president framed the recent appointments as necessary responses to actions deemed unconstitutional, emphasizing a commitment to restore constitutional order and civilian oversight of the security apparatus. The leadership transition was presented as part of a broader effort to reestablish governance through lawful channels and respect for the democratic process.
President Arce also extended public commendations to the Bolivian National Police, recognizing their continued fidelity to the constitution and their non-participation in the coup attempt. The police force’s stance was highlighted as an essential component of maintaining public safety and constitutional integrity during a period of political upheaval. The administration underscored that security forces should operate under the rule of law and under civilian leadership, a message aimed at reassuring citizens and regional partners about the trajectory of governance in Bolivia.
International reactions to the events surrounding the attempted power shift have been swift. The broader international community has expressed concern about the stability of Bolivia’s democratic institutions and has urged restraint on all sides while calling for a peaceful resolution. Various regional organizations and foreign governments have emphasized the importance of dialogue, constitutional legality, and the protection of human rights as the country navigates the crisis. The tone of these statements reflects a collective desire to prevent further disorder and to support a return to constitutional normalcy through transparent, lawful processes.
Earlier in the day, and in the hours preceding the public statements, Bolivian security forces ringed the area in front of the government complex, effectively surrounding the central square. The visible presence of troops and armored units around Murillo Square signaled the seriousness of the situation and the high stakes involved in any potential escalation. Observers noted a careful balance being sought between ensuring security and preserving civilian rights while officials assessed the legality and legitimacy of the actions being taken. As the city worked to resume ordinary life, officials cautioned residents to remain calm and to follow official guidance while the country sought a peaceful path forward.
In summary, the sequence of events in La Paz showcased a moment of constitutional tension, followed by leadership reorganization within the armed forces and a reaffirmation of civilian authority. The world watched as Bolivia navigated a delicate transition, seeking to uphold democratic norms, protect citizens, and restore stability in the capital and across the country. The episode stands as a reminder of the fragile balance between security institutions and elected government, and it underscores the ongoing importance of lawful processes, transparent communication, and collective commitment to peaceful resolution.