Kazakhstan has signaled a cautious stance toward sanctions on Russia, arguing that punitive measures could hurt its own economy. In an interview with the Japanese broadcaster NHK, Foreign Minister Mukhtar Tleuberdi explained that Kazakhstan believes sanctions against Russia would have negative consequences for its national economy and warned against measures that could be exploited by companies to circumvent restrictions.
From a regional perspective, the Kazakh leadership emphasizes a balanced foreign policy that seeks steady relations with major powers. President Kassym-Jomart Tokayev has maintained regular contact with the leaders of both Russia and Ukraine and has urged dialogue and a negotiated settlement to the conflict in Ukraine. Kazakhstan advocates a peaceful, diplomatic path to resolution and underscores the importance of avoiding actions that could escalate tensions in the region.
According to the Foreign Minister, Kazakhstan pursues a multifaceted foreign policy strategy. The country aims to cultivate mutually beneficial and equal relations with Russia, China, its Central Asian neighbors, as well as with Japan, the United States, and the European Union. This approach reflects a desire to balance security, economic interests, and regional stability while engaging with key international partners.
Tleuberdi noted that Russia remains a crucial economic partner for Kazakhstan, and that sanctions have had real effects on Kazakhstan’s economy. While Kazakhstan does not participate in sanctions against Russia, it adheres to a policy of not allowing sanctions evasion through its border or business networks. He highlighted how, when sanctions prompted many foreign companies to retreat from Russia, Kazakh authorities invited them to relocate their operations to Kazakhstan as part of maintaining economic continuity and regional connectivity.
In the broader context of regional cooperation, Kazakh officials have discussed deepening energy linkages with neighboring countries through potential multilateral arrangements. The idea of a tripartite energy framework involving Russia, Kazakhstan, and Uzbekistan has been a recurring topic in high level talks aimed at coordinating gas transport and ensuring supply through shared infrastructure. This discussion took place during a late November meeting in Moscow between Tokayev and President Vladimir Putin, where both leaders explored ways to coordinate gas transit across their territories.
According to Ruslan Zheldibay, the Kazakh presidential press secretary at the time, the talks included the proposal to involve expert teams from all three countries to study the project and identify solutions that respect the interests of each party. Deputy Foreign Minister Roman Vasilenko later stressed that any gas alliance would require careful technical consideration and an assessment of potential sanctions risks before moving forward. In early December Reuters reported that Uzbek authorities had retreated from the idea of forming a tripartite gas union with Russia and Kazakhstan, a setback framed by officials as a distinction between a formal alliance and a practical gas supply arrangement.
Kazakhstan’s leadership has been careful to distinguish between commercial gas deals and political blocs. Zhurabek Mirzamakhmudov, the energy minister and deputy prime minister of Uzbekistan, suggested that even if a natural gas agreement with Russia were secured, it would not automatically constitute a political alliance. He also noted that Uzbekistan would not accept political conditions tied to resource access, underscoring a preference for clear, businesslike terms over geopolitical leverage.
Subsequently, Channel One reported that Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov rejected the notion that Uzbekistan’s resistance signaled a broader political shift. He characterized Reuters coverage as an attempt to politicize routine energy discussions and noted that the involved countries were continuing to coordinate on technical and commercial matters rather than pursuing any political agenda. The discussion emphasized the need to align on practical outcomes while acknowledging the diverse positions held by each country.
As the narrative around regional energy cooperation evolves, officials reiterated that progress would depend on careful coordination. They highlighted that the emphasis should remain on technical collaboration and shared economic interests rather than on political conditioning. By mid-December, Russian ambassadors and other officials continued to indicate that talks on establishing a gas union were ongoing, while cautioning that media interpretations frequently misrepresent the nuanced positions of the participating states. This ongoing dialogue reflects a broader intent to maintain stability, promote steady energy flows, and safeguard national interests amid a shifting international landscape.
Overall, Kazakhstan presents a pragmatic approach to sanctions and regional energy policy. The government stresses the importance of dialogue, economic resilience, and fair participation in international markets. It acknowledges the consequences of sanctions on its own economy while pursuing strategic partnerships with major economies and neighboring countries. In this context, the country seeks to balance national sovereignty with regional integration, ensuring that its policies remain aligned with long-term stability and growth for its citizens.