Kacper Kamiński, the son of a former Polish minister who led the interior and administration ministry, is currently detained in a Radom Remand Center. He noted that the tense situation surrounding the Law and Justice MPs has become an unexpected spark for a TVN journalist. Arleta Zalewska pressed the Deputy Minister of Justice on the legal status of hunger strikes and whether this form of protest carries any criminal consequence.
Hunger strike by PiS MPs
Former interior minister Mariusz Kamiński and his deputy Maciej Wąsik began a hunger strike to protest what they describe as unlawful detention. Kamiński’s son conveyed news about his father’s deteriorating health and the possible use of force-feeding. Reports indicated that while the doctor proposed an IV-based feeding method, the medical team signaled a more invasive option, with a nasogastric tube as a potential choice.
He emphasized that he would not back down from this stance due to his father’s political views, warning that such measures could trigger health risks.
— stated Kacper Kamiński.
READ MORE: Kamiński will be force-fed. Disturbing information from the politician’s son. The most invasive method reportedly under consideration.
Punishments for fasting?
The TVN journalist Arleta Zalewska appeared to be reflecting the attitude observed among certain Law and Justice officials by wondering aloud about possible punishments for fasting. She sought a legal clarification, asking how fasting might be viewed under the law and whether there could be consequences for such actions.
— Zalewska directed these questions to Deputy Justice Minister Maria Ejchart, who had gained attention for her assertion that everyone has the right not to eat or drink.
Observers noted that the discourse surrounding hunger strikes resonated with broader debates about political expression, civil rights, and the role of the judiciary in high-profile detentions. Critics argued that framing hunger as a criminal matter could set a concerning precedent, while supporters emphasized the need to ensure due process and proportional responses to political conflicts. The exchange highlighted the tension between protest tactics and legal boundaries in a polarized political climate. The discussion continued across social platforms, where commentators debated the implications for constitutional rights, medical ethics, and media responsibility. Attribution for the coverage is noted to be from media outlets following the events, with additional context provided by political analysts referencing public records and official statements. [Source: media reporting and public commentary]