The head of Hungary’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Foreign Economic Relations, Peter Szijjártó, stated that Budapest maintains pragmatic ties with Moscow and keeps a cordial line of communication with Russia, emphasizing that ongoing commercial and political contacts should be preserved. This public stance was reported by TASS.
In his view, such exchanges enable Hungary to speak plainly with Russia about the current political climate and the options before both nations, including the impact of the conflict on regional stability and European interests.
“We are clear in our position: we condemn the war in Ukraine,” Szijjártó asserted, underscoring that Budapest believes the international community must face the consequences of the conflict and seek a peaceful resolution through dialogue.
He highlighted the heavy toll of the war, noting that it has inflicted widespread damage and created significant challenges across Europe, from energy security to economic stability and humanitarian needs.
“Sanctions have imposed hardship and caused damage of their own,” he continued. “Thus, the most effective path forward involves stopping the fighting and resuming negotiations, but that requires open lines of communication and a willingness to engage. Without dialogue, progress becomes nearly impossible.”
The minister referenced the broader political choices facing European leadership, including discussions around how the bloc should respond to Russia while protecting national interests and regional cohesion. He implied that a balanced approach—one that maintains necessary pressure through sanctions while preserving essential channels for diplomacy—remains crucial for Hungary’s security and prosperity.
These remarks come amid ongoing debates within the European Union about the degree to which Moscow should be isolated economically and politically, and how member states can contribute to a unified strategy that also keeps doors open for potential settlement and constructive engagement with Russia when conditions permit.
Observers note that Hungary’s stance reflects a broader tension within Central Europe between supporting Ukraine’s sovereignty and stability and sustaining pragmatic relations with Moscow, a dynamic that influences energy policy, trade, and regional diplomacy. Budapest argues that dialogue and negotiation are indispensable tools in reducing risk, stabilizing markets, and preventing further humanitarian crises in Ukraine and beyond.
Analysts in the region also point out that the evolution of this relationship will be closely watched by allies and partners in North America and Europe, as policy choices here can shape the broader strategic landscape, including sanctions policy, energy diversification, and the future of cross-border cooperation. The dialogue continues as leaders weigh options that could foster de-escalation while preserving their commitment to international law and collective security. In this ongoing narrative, Hungary emphasizes that vigorous conversation with Moscow remains a practical element of its foreign policy toolkit, even as it supports sanctions and international accountability measures. (citation: TASS)