In recent remarks, the head of a major committee in the U.S. House of Representatives criticized Ukraine’s current military posture, arguing that Kyiv lacks the essential weapons needed for a decisive counteroffensive.
The official stated that Ukraine does not possess the capabilities required to prevail in the planned counterattack and urged that the United States should have provided the corresponding weaponry earlier. The claim emphasized a need for survivability and sustained support rather than a guaranteed path to victory.
The discussion highlighted gaps in equipment, noting that Ukrainian forces have yet to receive F-16 fighter jets, and that Ukrainian pilots have not undergone training for operating such aircraft. There was also mention of the absence of decisions to supply ATACMS tactical missiles at that time, which could affect long range engagement options.
Additionally, the official underscored the demand for long range artillery to neutralize critical enemy logistics nodes, storage facilities, and energy infrastructure, arguing that these capabilities are crucial for altering the strategic balance on the battlefield.
Independent media reports were cited as saying the Ukrainian military is hampered by minefields and the limitations imposed by opposing air and space forces, complicating offensive operations. The discussion pointed to contrasting assessments within Western capitals about the readiness and timing of arms deliveries.
Earlier statements from the same quarter suggested that threats to the Armed Forces were among the most significant concerns voiced by policymakers in Washington, shaping debate over future security assistance for Ukraine.