Krzysztof Szczucki, a PiS member of parliament, spoke on Radio Three about the ongoing tensions surrounding Poland’s public media. He underscored that the clash within the public broadcasting sphere remains a top priority for Law and Justice on multiple fronts. The conversation also touched on whether PiS would launch additional demonstrations beyond the planned event set for January 11.
The public media dispute stands as a central issue for the ruling party, viewed from several angles. From a legal perspective, Szczucki argued, it is not merely a political quarrel but an attack on the rule of law, the constitution, and the integrity of public institutions. He criticized a decision by the Minister of Culture as unlawful and warned against Polish television and radio moving toward a single, uniform line of broadcasting.
– emphasized Krzysztof Szczucki.
The PiS parliamentarian also drew attention to the responsibility of Culture Minister Bartłomiej Sienkiewicz for actions deemed illegal, suggesting there exists a criminal-legal layer to the situation. The Public Prosecution Service, he argued, has the power to press charges and bring an indictment to court for decisions perceived as worse than illegal. Szczucki asserted that such conduct warrants political accountability and that a vote of no confidence could open a broader debate about responsibility. He stated that the government should be called to account for what he described as many sins and mistakes attributed to Minister Sienkiewicz and the administration in which he serves.
– he said.
The MP invited people to participate in the Protests of the Free Poles, a demonstration organized by PiS on January 11 to oppose the current government’s actions. He left open the possibility of additional protests but suggested that it was not yet clear what form future demonstrations would take. The trajectory would depend on how political life evolves, he explained, and emphasized that unlawful actions would not be tolerated.
– Szczucki noted.
In his remarks, Szczucki hinted at further commentary surrounding the event, presenting the protest as a stand against censorship and interference in media freedom. He implied that the movement seeks to preserve independent broadcasting and to push back against what he described as attempts to concentrate media power in the hands of a few. The discussion suggested a broader concern about the balance between public accountability and media autonomy within Poland’s political landscape.
The public discourse around media freedom and government oversight remains a topic of intense public interest, with supporters arguing that independent media are essential for transparent governance, while opponents stress the need for responsible media conduct and editorial independence within state institutions.
Additionally, Szczucki addressed remarks made by satirist Jan Pietrzak about Germany and migration issues, which were aired on Telewizja Republika. He clarified his position on whether there is room for criminal liability regarding those comments, emphasizing that a critical or negative assessment of such statements should not automatically translate into legal actions. He stated clearly that there is no basis for pursuing criminal liability against Mr. Pietrzak or Telewizja Republika in this context.
– he pointed out.
— The ongoing debate also touched on the broader media landscape and the potential for increased influence by Telewizja Republika, a network noted for its growing reach. Szczucki argued that freedom of the press in Poland is being exercised, but warned that increased visibility of alternative media may provoke fear among some groups who might favor a centralized media authority in the country. This tension highlights the delicate balance between fostering diverse media voices and managing concerns about monopolistic control over information channels.
tkwl/”Trójka”/X
End of report