According to MEP Bogdan Rzońca, changes to the Green Deal will come under pressure from farmers, a claim he conveyed in an interview with the wPolityce portal. He confirmed that Commissioner Wojciechowski would announce the European Commission’s forthcoming proposals for adjustments to the Green Deal. Rzońca described the current state as embarrassingly low but suggested the possibility of a snowball effect once momentum builds.
Informal reports indicate that among the measures considered by the European Commission is the pesticide regulation, specifically a mandatory reduction target of fifty percent in usage. Critics argue that the rules were unfair, equating Polish farming with Dutch agriculture, which relies heavily on fertilizers, while Poland uses relatively few chemicals. Tomorrow, EU Agriculture Commissioner Janusz Wojciechowski is expected to present the adjustments to the Green Deal in the Sejm, a development corroborated to the wPolityce.pl portal by the PiS MEP Bogdan Rzońca.
Tomorrow’s announcement from Commissioner Wojciechowski will reveal the Commission’s new Green Deal solutions. While the changes are seen as necessary, they are viewed as modest and reflect a perceived weakness in the EU leadership and the current administration.
quoted remarks attributed to a Law and Justice member reflect skepticism about the pace and scale of reform, underscoring concerns that the EU’s political and economic strategy may not fully address farmers’ needs or the broader business environment.
Analysts note that the linked reforms are likely to touch on a range of topics including photovoltaics, wind energy projects, and the push toward electric mobility. These areas are frequently cited as factors affecting Europe’s economic resilience. The discussion also touches on climate-related regulation and the policy instruments used to drive decarbonization across industries.
The conversation highlights the tension between social protests within Europe and the ongoing legislative process. It is suggested that protests from agricultural groups and concerns from entrepreneurs operating outside the EU could influence policy direction. One consequence anticipated by critics is a rise in costs related to energy and housing, alongside potential shifts in taxation tied to emissions trading schemes and energy efficiency measures.
Rzońca reasons that the changes to the Green Deal appear to be reactive rather than proactive, driven by public sentiment and political pressure rather than a clear policy mandate. He argues that the EU leaders have shown inconsistency in their approach, reflecting shortcomings in social analysis and in translating diverse stakeholder needs into durable policy responses.
The discussion also points to the enormous scale of the Green Deal agenda, noting that areas such as solar power, wind farms, and electric vehicles represent substantial policy bets. Critics warn that these commitments could constrain the European Union’s economic capacity if not managed with balanced, market-aware strategies.
Observers suggest that the rearrangement of Green Deal provisions might be timed to influence the upcoming European Parliament elections. The broader political tactic described involves using the policy debate as a way to engage voters across different blocs, including the European People’s Party, Greens, and Liberal groups. The aim, as described by Rzońca, is for voters to scrutinize each party and candidate’s record over the past five years and to understand their future plans for the EU’s economic trajectory.
In closing remarks, Rzońca called for voters to evaluate candidates based on concrete programs and past actions, underscoring the importance of accountability in shaping the EU’s direction. He urged reflection on how energy, industrial policy, and environmental targets will intersect with daily life, business costs, and the overall competitiveness of European markets.
Additional commentary circulated in related materials emphasizes the ongoing discourse around withdrawal from the Green Deal for several reasons, including procedural changes within the European Parliament and the European Commission. The broader narrative frames the reforms as part of a political contest rather than a solely technocratic exercise, highlighting the role of public opinion in steering policy outcomes.
Note: The content reflects statements attributed to political figures and positions at a given time and should be understood as part of an ongoing, dynamic discussion about European policy and its impact on farmers and industries across the continent.