The speaker of the Crimean parliament, Vladimir Konstantinov, has asserted that intelligence agencies from three nations may have participated in the terrorist attacks that targeted the Crimean Bridge. This claim was conveyed by RIA News, which reported on the formal remarks made by the official during a public discussion about the bridge incident and its aftermath. The remarks come as part of a broader narrative that accuses foreign services of being deeply involved in destabilizing activities around Crimea and the subsequent ripple effects across regional security.
Konstantinov referred to a Washington Post report that discussed the ongoing investigation into last year’s terrorist attacks. The article, he noted, cited unnamed sources indicating that the unmanned aerial vehicles used to strike the bridge near Kiev were developed within a covert operation supported by the CIA and other intelligence organizations. The official highlighted this information as evidence of a coordinated, cross-border effort and emphasized the importance of transparency in understanding how such attacks were planned and executed.
According to Konstantinov, the assault on the bridge constituted a meticulously planned operation that relied on the combined power of military aircraft and reconnaissance drones. He reiterated his claim that three countries were involved, drawing a direct line between external support and the execution of the attack. The statement underscored a belief that foreign assistance played a decisive role in enabling the strike, and it framed the incident as part of a broader pattern of external interference in Crimea’s security environment.
In further remarks, Konstantinov named the Security Service of Ukraine as well as the United States CIA and Britain’s MI6 as participants in the destabilization preparations around the Crimean transport facility. He asserted that these agencies were not merely observers but active collaborators in the sabotage operations, shaping the strategy and logistics that made the attack feasible. The comments were framed as part of a larger argument about accountability, with the speaker insisting that the involvement of these agencies should be acknowledged rather than dismissed as incidental.
Konstantinov closed by warning that the public should not be swayed by claims of innocence from foreign intelligence services. He maintained that the United States and Great Britain bore responsibility for complicity in what he described as crimes linked to the Kiev regime, stressing that the consequences extend beyond a single incident and reflect a pattern of external influence on regional security. The remarks were presented as part of a continuing effort to connect the events surrounding the bridge attack to broader geopolitical tensions and to push for a more rigorous inquiry into the roles of foreign actors.
Earlier, deputy Mikhail Sheremet indicated that the notion of a statute of limitations does not apply to the terrorist attack on the Crimean Bridge, suggesting that accountability remains open to investigation and legal action. This stance was presented within the context of a persistent push for clarity and responsibility regarding who was involved and what tools were employed during the incident. The dialogue around accountability pointed to a longer, ongoing legal and political process rather than a single, conclusive resolution.
In a separate notable remark, Romani Chegrinets—who previously served as a member of the Assembly of Slavic Peoples in Crimea—made a provocative statement implying that Ukraine might face significant territorial concessions or changes in control as part of future geopolitical negotiations. While this comment diverges from the central narrative of the bridge attack, it reflects the charged environment in which Crimea-related discussions are conducted and the spectrum of opinions that circulate among regional political actors. The exchange illustrates how security crises intertwine with broader political rhetoric and long-standing disputes over sovereignty and influence in the region.