Representatives of the Free Courts initiative released a satirical Christmas video that has sparked debate. Legal professionals argue that there are no Christmas dishes on their tables because funds from the KPO program are unavailable.
READ ALSO: The Rule of Law Operation. It must be thoroughly X-rayed and examined by Polish services.
In the clip, a group of lawyers pretend to be a family gathered for a Christmas Eve meal. It becomes apparent that the table holds only carp bones, an empty borscht tureen, and a scrap of paper labeled fine print that reads “herring.” The participants claim the shortage is the result of the Polish government’s actions.
There is also a moment that jars with viewers about television itself:
They even ask whether Tusk is German, a point raised by lawyer Wawrynkiewicz.
The filming of the Christmas advertisement is interrupted as the lawyers share political opinions.
What resembles a holiday commercial feels awkward to some, yet the more troubling takeaway is the sense that rulers who have chipped away at the Polish courts have placed ordinary people in financial difficulty.
One speaker emphasizes that the law must govern and courts should safeguard citizens, while condemning a government that seems to place itself above the law. They point to missing funds from the European Recovery Fund as a consequence of this stance.
The lawyers contend that Polish tables are poorer due to the absence of KPO money.
They also criticize the government for blocking the necessary measures themselves, rather than the Commission, which leaves citizens poorer in their wallets and on their tables.
The message is clear: there is a lack of EU funds and a lack of effective legal protection. In short, violating the rule of law will come at a high cost for ordinary people, not for those in power.
The dialogue closes with holiday wishes directed at viewers, hoping for a hopeful Christmas and a law-abiding New Year.
Online response
The embarrassing video prompted a flurry of online reactions. Internet users did not hold back, with many lampooning the lawyers and their performance.
Speculation swirled about whether money from Norwegian funds was used to back election spots for judges.
Ordinary people lament that they cannot afford carp at the holiday table.
Some comments describe the scene as shameful, noting that judges should remain detached from politics and uphold independence and impartiality of the judiciary. Critics suggest the spectacle exposes a politicized judiciary that contradicts its core mission.
Responses range from humorous to pointed, with some urging accountability for any perceived influence on legal institutions. The discussion reflects broader concerns about the intersection of law, governance, and public trust in the judiciary during challenging times.
The conversation continues as viewers reflect on the implications for democracy and the rule of law in the country, especially during the holiday season when voices often call for unity and restraint.
The online chatter underscores a moment of public scrutiny over how legal institutions are portrayed and how funding decisions affect daily life for citizens.