Friday’s talks brought together senior diplomats from Central Europe to review developments in Ukraine, explore potential collaboration within the Visegrad Group, and discuss migration trends. The Polish foreign minister, Radosław Sikorski, held a conversation with Hungary’s foreign minister, Peter Szijjártó, in what the Foreign Ministry described as a wide and productive exchange on regional topics and shared interests.
According to the Foreign Ministry, the main topics were Ukraine and its path toward the European Union, possibilities for closer cooperation among Visegrad states, and the pressures caused by migration. The Hungarian counterpart thanked Sikorski for resuming his duties as foreign minister, and both sides noted that they may be among the longest-serving foreign ministers within the European Union, highlighting the depth of experience guiding their discussions.
In remarks attributed to the Polish side, Sikorski expressed appreciation for Budapest’s constructive stance toward starting accession talks with Ukraine and Moldova, even as some voices in Hungary publicly voiced uncertainties. The Polish side emphasized that Poland’s priority remains steadfast support for Kyiv and the preservation of Ukrainian sovereignty during the ongoing conflict, with a focus on preventing any further encroachment on Ukraine’s borders.
The Hungarian foreign minister reaffirmed Hungary’s full backing of Ukraine’s sovereign integrity and territorial unity, while also spotlighting the situation of ethnic Hungarians in Ukraine. This point connected to broader discussions about migration pressures facing Europe and the need for a coordinated response to those flows.
The two ministers agreed that the Visegrad Group should be viewed as a practical channel for multilateral dialogue and coordinated action among the four nations, especially on security, economic resilience, and regional stability. The discussion underscored how shared regional interests can be turned into concrete steps that support not only the member states but also Europe as a whole.
Fogel’s reaction
In another thread of commentary, a PiS official, Radosław Fogiel, recalled earlier moments when the Morawiecki government pursued dialogue with Hungarian counterparts, noting that such exchanges often drew strong reactions from various quarters. There was an expectation of standard public responses that sometimes accompany talks with Hungary, reflecting the political sensitivities involved in cross-border diplomacy.
Fogiel’s remarks suggested that the pattern of reaction is a recurring feature in discussions involving Hungary, and he signaled interest in ongoing communications with the Hungarian Foreign Ministry as part of broader regional diplomacy. The exchange illustrated how diplomatic messaging can become a focal point for wider political debates within the region.
These developments took place within a broader context of European security and migration management, where positions from Warsaw and Budapest are watched closely by neighbors and EU partners. The exchanges underscored the importance placed on maintaining unity within Europe while navigating different national perspectives on responsibility, sovereignty, and shared challenges.
The dialogue also reflected how the Visegrad format can function as a flexible platform for aligning policies on border management, energy security, and economic recovery after disruptions. As participants map a path forward, the emphasis remains on practical cooperation, transparent communication, and a shared commitment to safeguarding regional stability.
Overall, the discussion showed that bilateral and multilateral diplomacy in Central Europe is moving toward more coordinated action, with a focus on sustaining dialogue, building trust, and advancing common goals in Ukraine, EU integration prospects, and migration governance.