Vietnam is poised to send a delegation to the BRICS summit in Kazan, according to reports from the Vietnamese embassy in Moscow. The announcement notes that the exact leadership of the delegation had not yet been decided, reflecting the early stage of planning and diplomacy surrounding Vietnam’s possible participation.
Analysts say BRICS’ push to strengthen the voice of developing countries in the Global South aligns with Hanoi’s broader strategic goals. If Vietnam formally joins BRICS, it could gain access to substantial capital resources and new markets through collaborative projects and economic initiatives that are directly connected to BRICS programs.
On the prior day, Laos’s President Thongloun Sisoulith signaled attendance at the Kazan summit, reinforcing the role of regional players in BRICS discussions and the potential for deeper Southeast Asian engagement with the bloc. The presence of regional leaders underscores BRICS’s interest in expanding influence beyond its traditional members.
Reporting shows that Turkey officially submitted its application to join BRICS on September 2. Sources indicate Ankara had been exploring membership for months after EU accession talks stalled, with the country having pursued EU candidacy since 1999. Turkey’s move highlights the bloc’s appeal as a platform for diversifying alliances and tapping new markets, alongside ongoing negotiations on standards, governance, and the pace of expansion.
Additionally, other nations have expressed interest in BRICS, reflecting a growing appetite for a broader coalition that can influence global trade, finance, and development agendas. Observers emphasize that BRICS expansion involves careful coordination on criteria for entry, consensus on policy priorities, and the practical benefits for prospective members in areas such as infrastructure funding, technology transfer, and regional partnerships.
For Vietnam and its partners, BRICS represents a potential channel to accelerate development plans, diversify funding sources, and engage with a bloc that prioritizes inclusive growth and resilience. The discussions focus on how BRICS can facilitate large-scale investments, foster innovation, and create opportunities in sectors like manufacturing, energy, and digital infrastructure.
Observers caution that membership would come with responsibilities, including alignment with BRICS principles, participation in consensus-building, and adherence to governance norms. Regardless, the dialogue signals that the BRICS framework is evolving and that emerging economies are looking to shape the rules of global economic exchange alongside traditional powers.
Vietnam, Laos, and Turkey are among several nations weighing the benefits and obligations of deeper BRICS cooperation. The conversations reflect a broader shift as more economies seek to participate in a forum that aims to influence development finance, trade rules, and strategic collaborations across multiple regions.
For policymakers in Hanoi, joining BRICS could complement existing ties with major economies in Asia and beyond, providing a platform to coordinate development finance, infrastructure planning, and technology transfer that aligns with national priorities. It would also require careful calibration with partners in the region to ensure that participation supports growth without creating undue exposure to volatile capital flows or geopolitical frictions.
Ultimately, BRICS remains a dynamic forum offering new possibilities for member and aspirant economies. The ongoing conversations suggest that the bloc is considering not only who can join but how the expanded collaboration can advance shared development goals, address climate challenges, and foster resilient growth in a congested global economy.