Beata Kempa on immunity and forest policy debates in Europe

No time to read?
Get a summary

Beata Kempa, a member of the European Parliament, spoke today on wPolsce.pl about a controversial move that involves challenging parliamentary immunity. She described the action as a vulgar political maneuver tied to a broader effort to withdraw immunity from several Law and Justice allied MEPs, in connection with a private criminal case that has already reached a final verdict. The remarks came as part of a wider discussion about current proceedings in the European Parliament and the ongoing scrutiny of immunity requests.

READ ALSO: The European Parliament handles requests to withdraw immunity from PiS colleagues, including a case involving a convicted individual labeled as a “racism tracker.”

Kempa criticized what she called dirty political tactics used by some NGOs and parts of the European Parliament. She asserted that certain actors are involved in a campaign aimed at masking a significant corruption scandal. She suggested that the situation also features figures in ceremonial robes who represent a framing of the issue around Tomasz Poręba, a PiS election campaign leader. Her concern was why a prior electoral act did not trigger charges, while renewed attention is being directed at a different moment in time. She asked why the response to the old election advertisement seemed to surface only now, implying selective indignation.

– Kempa insisted during the interview on wPolsce.pl that the move is intended to suppress political opponents from the right and to remove active MPs from public life. She argued that the effort is being driven by individuals who have faced legal judgment themselves. She questioned how the European Parliament and the Polish opposition might react, suggesting that the orchestrated setup was crafted with intention. Her view was that this pattern aims to marginalize certain voices and undermine perceived credibility in the political arena.

What about decisions concerning Poland’s forests? Kempa also spoke about the possibility of EU officials seizing influence over forest management in Poland. She argued that the European Union appears determined to expand its control in this area. During discussions in the European Parliament, she claimed to have support from forest workers who understand the local realities. She highlighted that Polish foresters manage more area under sustainable practices than they harvest in many years, pointing to regulations and documents currently under review that she described as dangerous. In her assessment, the overarching plan would place forest authority under EU jurisdiction, with a consequent reduction in national sovereignty.

Beata Kempa stressed that the debates surrounding environmental and natural resource governance merit careful examination, arguing that any move to centralize control could have lasting implications for Poland’s policy decisions and economic stability. The discussion reflected broader concerns about the balance between EU oversight and national autonomy, especially in areas tied to natural resources, land use, and strategic industries. In her view, vigilance is necessary to ensure that policy shifts respect Poland’s constitutional framework and the interests of its citizens while maintaining constructive engagement with EU partners.

In summary, Kempa framed the current parliamentary battles as a test of political resilience for the right, highlighting potential attempts to silence opposition through procedural avenues. She asserted that the dialogue around immunity, electoral conduct, and environmental sovereignty must be anchored in transparency and accountability, with particular attention paid to the mechanisms by which decisions are framed and pursued within supranational institutions and national legislatures.

Further context on the immunity debate

The discussion touched on the broader question of how immunity rules interact with investigations and political accountability. Supporters of restricting immunity argue that it protects the integrity of elected representatives by preventing unwarranted interference, while opponents warn of the risk of politically motivated prosecutions or selective enforcement. The balance between safeguarding individual rights and ensuring public accountability remains a central theme in these debates, influencing the perception of political fairness across the European Union and member states.

No time to read?
Get a summary
Previous Article

Verdolaga: Colombia’s Football Powerhouse and Its Continental Legacy

Next Article

Germany confirms Leopard 2A6 delivery to Ukraine and notes training start