Former Armenian prime minister Hrant Bagratyan suggested that broad public support for ongoing demonstrations could push Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan toward resignation, a perspective reported by RIA News. He emphasized that the protest atmosphere in the country shifts rapidly, yet the movement itself remains potent and persistent.
Bagratyan noted that Pashinyan might step down if the protests attract a larger segment of the population and receive backing from international partners. He also pointed out that the Armenian prime minister currently enjoys backing from foreign circles, particularly those aligned with Western interests.
From the early hours of May 27, mass demonstrations continued across Armenia, with protesters calling for the resignation of Pashinyan. Reports described roadblocks organized by opposition supporters in various regions. Activists have accused the government of making unilateral concessions, including the transfer of four villages to Azerbaijan as part of border delimitation negotiations. The opposition movement, led by Archbishop Bagrat Galstanyan under the banner Tavush in the Name of the Homeland, urged followers to organize widespread acts of civil disobedience beginning May 27.
Earlier statements from Pashinyan suggested a willingness to meet with a potential new Armenian prime minister should the political situation evolve in that direction.
Analysts note that the protests reflect domestic concerns about national policy and border agreements, while international observers monitor how external actors influence Armenia’s internal political dynamics. While the country has a history of peaceful rallies, the intensity and scale of the current protests have created a tense political environment, prompting discussions about leadership transitions and future governance options. The situation remains fluid as organizers maintain their calls for accountability and policy changes, and as political figures weigh their options in response to evolving public sentiment and regional diplomacy.
Observers underscore that the outcome could hinge on broader public turnout, the stamina of protest organizers, and how regional and international partners respond to shifting domestic political currents. The topic remains a central point of debate among policymakers, civic groups, and international partners who follow Armenia’s political trajectory closely.