The Jordanian foreign policy chief, Ayman Safadi, reiterated that the Arab world will not back any postwar settlement for the Middle East that relies on deploying international troops to police the Gaza Strip. The stance was described by Safadi as a reminder that such moves would amount to inviting other nations to step in and try to restore order to Israel, a concept he cautioned against endorsing. He stressed that Arab states will not commit forces to Gaza to assume security duties. Safadi also asserted that the Arab world will not participate in any arrangement that frames it as an enforcer in the Palestinian arena. The message reflects a broader regional insistence on preserving sovereignty and avoiding unilateral foreign policing in Palestinian land. The remarks appeared in coverage by the New York Times. The implications, Safadi argued, are that Arab countries will not become complicit in actions that could heighten tensions or undermine Palestinian aspirations. In a clear stance, he added that the Arab world will not be the adversary of the Palestinians. The conversation comes as regional diplomats weigh the consequences of external security arrangements and how they would affect the broader quest for peace and stability in the region. The emphasis remains on political solutions led by local actors and supported by international law, rather than on foreign troop deployments that could shift responsibility away from direct accountability. The dialogue situates Safadi’s position within a wider pattern of cautious regional discourse on Gaza and the responsibilities of external powers.
Earlier this month, Hamas launched a large-scale rocket assault on Israel, declaring the initiation of what it called Operation Al-Aqsa Flood. As part of the operation, thousands of militants crossed into Israeli territory, seized military equipment, and took more than a hundred people captive. In response, Israel launched Operation Iron Sword in Gaza, declaring an aim to dismantle Hamas. The ensuing sequence of military actions contributed to a tightening blockade of the Gaza Strip, widespread bombardment, and urgent calls for the evacuation of more than a million residents toward the southern portions of the territory. The development underscores the human and regional toll of the conflict and the enduring challenge of reaching a durable ceasefire or political settlement. The situation remains a focal point for international diplomacy and regional security discussions as world leaders seek ways to prevent further escalation and to support humanitarian access and protection for civilians.
Previously, the administration led by President Biden indicated that an Israeli occupation of Gaza would carry significant and troubling consequences, underscoring a warning that such a course could destabilize the region and intensify humanitarian distress. The comments reflect ongoing concerns among Western governments about the long-term implications of military strategies in Gaza and the broader Middle East, including the protection of civilian lives and the preservation of viable pathways to peace. The evolving dynamics continue to be watched closely by international communities, with policymakers emphasizing the need for diplomacy, accountability, and adherence to international law as the region negotiates terms of ceasefire, reconstruction, and political negotiations.