Since the start of this year, eight municipalities in Alicante have been required to implement low emission zones (ZBE), yet none have taken the step so far. The real reason isn’t technical; it’s political. Mobility policies have become a flashpoint, with pedestrianization projects and new bike lanes triggering strong reactions from various groups. Experts note that opposition forces often weaponize these measures to undermine opponents during elections, turning mobility debates into political battlegrounds.
The reason behind the EU directive is clear: low emission zones are mandated for cities with more than 50,000 inhabitants. The aim is to improve air quality and contribute to climate action through measures like traffic restrictions, parking controls, and encouraging cleaner transport. In Alicante province, towns such as Alicante, Elche, Torrevieja, Orihuela, Benidorm, San Vicente del Raspeig, Alcoy, and Elda fall under this requirement, but so far none have put it into effect.
Interest in this policy is not isolated to the Valencian Community. Of 149 cities obligated by law, only about twenty began the year with any traffic-restriction mechanism in place, despite the central government’s demand for full operational status by early 2023. Madrid and Barcelona are among the cities that started the year implementing such zones.
In Alicante, the projected ZBE would likely shield two circular routes: an outer ring defined by the Gran Vía and an inner ring that encompasses the urban core and historic center. Elche plans to expand the restricted area to 536 hectares, covering El Pla, Altabix, and El Raval. Yet, these plans remain largely on paper as authorities wait for formal applications. The Federation of Municipalities and Provinces has urged delays to give councils more room to maneuver, and the proximity of local elections has been cited as a pivotal factor in postponements.
argument
Mobility policies tend to spark controversy wherever they’re applied. In the regional capital, residents in Raval Roig opposed the pedestrianization of Calle Virgen del Socorro, arguing it would affect parking facilities. In Elche, criticism has focused on the removal of parking spaces and the disruptions caused by a new bike lane from General Hospital to Pedro Juan Perpiñán street. Alcoy has faced accusations over the pedestrianization of old-town streets and a bike path linking the city center to the Northern Territory. These examples illustrate how urban reforms can provoke strong local reactions while stakeholders weigh trade-offs between cleaner air and everyday convenience.
Against this backdrop, it’s unsurprising that some municipal authorities have delayed ZBE implementation. The fear is that timing could hurt election prospects, a concern reinforced by opposition parties that see value in debating these reforms without rushing them through.
A sociologist from the University of Alicante notes that the right side of the political spectrum often uses mobility issues as a lever in campaigns. He points out that Vox has made climate-skeptic stances a political talking point, arguing that parties like the Popular Party must reconcile moderate positions with the influence of far-right postulates as they govern. In Alicante, he argues, the mayor reportedly kept the low emission plan in a drawer to avoid confronting potential electoral consequences. This framing highlights how mobility policy intersects with broader debates about governance, taxes, and public services.
The same analyst suggests that taxation, public services, and resource management become battlegrounds where the right tries to frame policy decisions as political risk. Critics say the far right sometimes distorts sustainable development goals, turning practical needs into polarization. The argument is not about abandoning climate goals but about finding a balanced approach that maintains everyday life while guiding cities toward cleaner transport.
Low emission zones and electric vehicle cause half of workshops in Alicante to close
Some observers emphasize that reducing CO2 emissions should be pursued with scientific evidence, not political rhetoric. The rapid pace of debate can overlook the pragmatic benefits of low emission zones, such as lower traffic-related noise, fewer accidents, and healthier air for residents. Critics worry about the electoral risks of unpopular moves, while supporters insist the policy is a long-term investment in urban life and public health.
Experts argue that educators and policymakers must engage communities with transparent pedagogy and dialogue. They stress that mobility measures are not about banning daily activities, but about designing smarter urban spaces, expanding reliable public transport, and offering practical alternatives for residents. The goal is to build broad support by showing tangible benefits and ensuring smooth transitions for commuters and local businesses alike.
Acceleration
Armando Ortuño, a professor of regional planning, transport, and environment, reminds readers that air-quality improvements and safer streets have been studied for decades. The EU’s call for low-emission zones is a continuation of a trend toward cleaner cities. While some councils hesitated, the consensus among experts is moving toward decisive action. The path forward requires strengthening public transport, expanding bike networks, and improving urban infrastructure design. Pedestrianization, when implemented thoughtfully, can even boost commerce by drawing more foot traffic and supporting local traders, provided loading and unloading rules accommodate residents.
Experts urge that policy should be informed by dialogue with neighbors and sustained by practical roadmaps. They argue that there is no valid excuse to stall progress when sensible measures can coexist with everyday life. The emphasis should be on inclusive planning that handles trade-offs transparently and respectfully.
Municipalities are offering fines of 200 euros to drivers who do not comply with Low Emission Zones.
Political actors continue to frame mobility reforms in ways that suit their agendas. Some groups, advocating for repeal, warn of negative impacts on small businesses and daily life. Others champion pedestrianization and cycling, highlighting examples from Valencia and Elche as proof that urban centers can remain accessible and vibrant. Public discourse in provinces like Alicante involves a spectrum of positions on sustainable urban mobility and how it should be implemented in towns with substantial populations.
The debate often centers on how policies will be financed and how changes will be integrated with existing services. Proposals vary from expanding public transport networks, like tram lines between Orihuela, Torrevieja, and the airport corridor, to integrating mobility options in mid-sized towns above a 20,000-resident threshold. Park-and-go strategies around major cities also receive attention as a practical way to ease transitions for drivers and residents alike.