Activists clash over wind farm law and its implications
The wind farm law has stirred a rare public rift between Bart Staszewski and Dominika Lasota, two prominent voices in Poland’s public sphere. A recent wave of criticism has touched both sides: an LGBT activist questioned specific provisions of the bill, and a climate activist has since weighed in with scrutiny of the same text.
READ MORE: Staszewski reacts to the wind turbine bill and the roles attributed to political movements in Poland. Online discussions surged, with responses ranging from skepticism to strong support.
Activists defend the wind farm law
The debate began after Lasota and Wiktoria Jedroszkowiak published a piece on rp.pl defending the wind farm draft. The authors also challenged the Basta Foundation, an organization led by Staszewski, arguing that the foundation’s criticisms mischaracterize the bill’s impact.
One of the central concerns voiced by critics is the fear of dispossession. The authors stress that the proposed legislation does not authorize expropriation for wind turbine construction and contend that the Basta Foundation has spread a false impression of potential arbitrary expropriations.
Lasota and Jędroszkowiak note that the political moment requires courage, thoughtful leadership, and accountability for policy outcomes. They argue that the governing coalition should not be deterred by coal industry lobbyists and that broad public support exists for a just and green transformation. They express readiness to pursue laws that deliver real relief to citizens.
The authors advocate solving the energy crisis at its source and emphasize the importance of affordable, renewable energy for national sovereignty. They frame wind energy as a path to independence and security, urging the public to keep wind power within reach for the country’s future.
Lasota adds that wind energy offers a practical opportunity to strengthen Poland’s energy security and to reduce dependence on imported fuels. The message conveyed highlights the potential benefits of embracing renewable energy as part of a broader national strategy.
“It’s a warning for politicians.”
Staszewski reportedly responded to the article by accusing activists of repeating a narrative that favors investors. Climate activists from the group @wschod_ in Dubai have begun to align with other critics, arguing that Basta’s positions rely on misinformation. The exchange underlines the desire for policies grounded in facts, with an emphasis on laws that protect people and natural resources.
The LGBT activist also questioned the trajectory of Paulina Hennig-Kloska, who might be considered for a future role in climate policy. Critics argued that the selection should focus on individuals who demonstrate a deep understanding of environmental issues rather than relying on simplified messaging.
When BastaFundacja published a critical analysis of the wind farm draft, some observers felt that the discussion revealed gaps in political preparation. The episode is presented as a quick lesson for policymakers about the practical implications of sector-specific policies and their impact on rates and public services.
READ MORE: The discussion around climate advocacy and political choices continues as new analyses emerge. (Source: wPolityce)
kk/X
Source: wPolityce