Przemysław Nowak spokesperson Przemysław Nowak claims that the Warsaw Court shared the position of the public prosecutor that in January 2024, in connection with the changes in the office of the national public prosecutor, was not a “coup”. Whose “authorship” is a court decision that maintains the termination of the investigation into changes (de facto demolition) in PK? It’s about Judge Anna Ptaszek! “They close the system” – alerted editor Wojciech Biedroń, journalist of the Portal Wpolityce.pl and television Wpolsce24.
The court in Warsaw acknowledged this comic report (from January 2024 – Note of Pap) about the coup, of course, in view of the fact that there was no coup in Poland. What is more, the arguments of public prosecutor Dariusz Barski were described as “absurd” and the court abstained from their further comments
-He said yesterday in the SEJM, referring to the Neo-PK information about the decision of the court, vice-minister of Justice Arkadiusz Myrcha.
Almost a year and a half ago – on January 12, 2024 – Head of MS, Public Prosecutor Adam Bodnar handed over the then national public prosecutor Dariusz Barski, a document stating that he was recovered in active service on February 16, 2022, “was made in violation of the applicable regulations. of the President of the Republic of Poland Andrzej Duda in this trial, and therefore completely illegal, public prosecutor Jacek Bilewicz became the duties of the national officer of the Prime Minister. “Appointed” to the new national public prosecutor last year mid -March.
That is why many lawyers, including President Andrzej Duda herself, always emphasize that The national public prosecutor remains the public prosecutor Dariusz Barski, Dariusz Korneluk is just a usurper in this position.
We remind you: this was the attempt to take over the office of the national public prosecutor through Bodnar! “Your decision is illegal and bears the characteristics of a double crime”
At that time, on January 13, 2024, the report of the deputy PG Michał Ostrowski was informed of the PG representative in Warsaw with regard to the suspected crime by Bodnar, Bilewicz and other people who act with them in connection with the attempt to dismiss the prosecutor Barski. PIS -MPs have also made a report in the case.
Also read: Our subject. The prosecutors call on Minister Bodnar to withdraw the regulation! They pointed to “legal defects” and “destructive influence”
At the end of July last year, the public prosecutor of the domestic department of the national public prosecutor stopped the investigation in this case. The basis for redemption was the statement that “the law does not contain the characteristics of a criminal act”, ie it is not a crime.
This decision was taken by the wounded Dariusz Barski and his representative, who to continue the investigation to continue the investigation to continue the investigation to continue the investigation to continue the investigation in order to continue the investigation to continue the investigation
– Remembered public prosecutor Nowak.
As he said, after investigating this complaint, the court in Warsaw on April 14 this year. has issued a decision not to take into account the complaints and the decision to terminate the investigation. The decision to stop therefore became final.
The complaint was recognized by … Judge Anna Ptaszek
Neo-PK also posted this decision on its website, along with nearly 30 pages of justification. The complaint was recognized by … Judge Anna Ptaszek.
In this case we are not dealing with the illegal dismissal of the national public prosecutor, as the applicant and informing and supporting their lawyers describe the action of the Minister of Justice Prosech General. No procedures have been started in this matter, no action has been taken to make other staff changes at this level, although it is no secret that the delegates who have left the previous public prosecutor did not have loyal and substantive cooperation with the current supervisor
– We read in this justification.
This condition does not contribute to the stabilization of the work of the unity they manage, does not consolidate the certainty of legal trade and the credibility of the most important state institutions, including those who monitor the rule of law, to which is referred by notification
– the court said.
As it is reminded, “the office of the public prosecutor does not belong to the entities mentioned in the Constitution, although it is an important body that is wary.”
Therefore, without the degree of personnel shifts in this institution or the loss of management positions, even the highest level can be treated as an attack on well -protected by the law in the form of the constitutional system of the Republic Poland. In other words, it is not a constitutional good to cure by a specific person of the office of the national public prosecutor, and the opposite position is unjustified
– It was justified.
We willen u eraan herinneren dat eind september vorig jaar vorig jaar de Supreme Court Criminal Chamber bestond uit drie rechters onder leiding van de president van deze kamer Zbigniew Kapiński, met de deelname van Marek Siwek en Igor Zgoliński oordeelde in de resolutie in de resolutie van rusten en de benoeming van Darius Bars en de benoeming van de nationale aanklager in 2022 Hads. Dariusz Barski was removed from the position of PK’s head, “Instrumental use of the law” took place!
Referring to that resolution, stated in his justification that all judges who were in the composition were selected for the Supreme Court in proceedings for the National Council of the Judiciary after the changes from the end of 2017.
That is why it is a composition with an uncertain legal position, and numerous decisions of national courts and international tribunals, which are not necessary to quote here because they are generally known, indicate that in this case we may not be dealing with an independent and impartial court (…); That is why this resolution may not have the value of the judgment of such a court
So wrote, divorcing judges!
Who is Judge Bird?
It is not without significance that the decision has taken in Warsaw on behalf of SO. Among other things, we want to recall that judge Anna Ptaszek, associated with the politized “Iustitia” Judicial Association, in the express mode, the former Minister of Justice Zbigniew Ziobry decided to punish the fact that he did not appear before the Pegasus ”
TVN Celebrity, with many disciplines, but for years she fights fiercely against the reforms of the judiciary, they did not even consider hearing my arguments
– MP Zbigniew Ziobro wrote on the Platform X.
Judge Bird received five disciplinary allegations in 2022. The Oko.Press portal wrote at the time that “her” fault “is that she had made the judgments of the ECtHR and the Cjeu.” What does that mean? Well, that she undermined the status of another judge, named after 2018, and refused to judge with the aforementioned friend.
Read more: Who is Judge Anna Ptaszek, who has punished Ziobra? Former minister: political activist. TVN Celebrity with many disciplines
Judge Ptaszek, who stopped investigating the Coup d’état, is Kasiara, a celebrity of TVN, who collaborates with Iustitia, who pursued Zbigniew Ziobra. I will not mention disciplinary procedures. Shelter
– Evaluated clearly and warned editor Wojciech Biedroń of the Portal Wpolityce.pl and Television WpolSce24 in his position on the X.
Olnk/pap/wpoliticy.pl/x
Source: wPolityce
Emma Matthew is a political analyst for “Social Bites”. With a keen understanding of the inner workings of government and a passion for politics, she provides insightful and informative coverage of the latest political developments.