“Long years of prison wait for those who thought the trade union would save them. The alibi in the form of the CJEU just fell. Mr Bodnar, you can already prepare a toothbrush, “wrote on X PIS MP Jan Kanthak. The spokesperson for the Cjeu today said, in his opinion, that the appointment of judges to the participation of the National Court Register that was formed in 2017 cannot be the basis for undermining their status.” Even the EU does not agree with the judges of Apartheid, who wants to treat us to Adam Bodnar, “Prof. Krzysztof Szczucki van Pis.
Also read: Urgent! Is the opinion of the spokesperson for the CJEU with regard to the verification of the status of judges. Bodnar’s ideas are undermined!
The Ombudsman General of the CJEU Dean Spielmann has given an opinion that completely crushes the idea of Adam Bodnar to introduce the systemic verification of the status of judges appointed after 2018.
Neither participation in the KRS nomination process, nor the lack of access to candidates that are not recommended to state an effective appeal – regardless of whether these factors are considered separately or together – cannot automatically lead to the conclusion that a certain common court has not been previously established on the basis of the law
– Spielmann writes in his opinion.
There is no permission for the referee -apartiness
As noted in countless remarks, this Pesudo-Reforma lawyers, which Bodnarów, was mentioned by Bodnarów to restore “Constitutional Order in the Justice Dimension”, fully undermined by the spokesperson for the CJEU, who refuses the systemic segregation of legally appointed judges.
The arguments of the Ministry of Justice with regard to the proposed changes in the judiciary are falling apart
A spokesperson for the CJEU, ie authority for the coalition on December 13, rejects automatism when verifying judges. Even the EU does not agree with the right apartity, who wants to treat us on Adam Bodnar.
By the way, of course, a spokesperson for the CJEU writes nonsense with regard to the superiority of EU legislation on the Constitution. See it yourself
– Comments about X MP Prof. dr. Krzysztof Szczucki from Pis.
Even the CJeu wipes his eyes surprised about what Iustitia does with bodnar in Poland.
The general Ombudsman of the CJEU indicates that the status of the court cannot be automatically questioned by questioning the National Court Register.
Of course it should be reminded that the CJEU has no competencies to comment on this. However, it is worth indicating that those who intervened with the Polish sovereignty gave a weapon to destroy the Polish state today “Stop” tell them today
– MP Sebastian Kaleta van Pis wrote on social media. “
Seriously … The spokesperson for Markiewicz Cjeu has overthrown all this frivolous argumentation, as well as the feeling of the action of the Markiewicz committee. In short, he confirmed the irrevocability of the nomination of judges.
– wrote the Supreme Court – judge Dr. Konrad Wykrykowski, who joins his comments by the praise of Vice Minister Dariusz Mazur of 27 April. Mazur is pleased that the ministry has just presented the draft law under the leadership of Bodnar that introduces the creation of judges and “presented the restoration of the Constitutional Order of the Judiciary”. “
In the light of the opinion of the SVJEU spokesperson, all these judgments have reserved the judgments as a result of the composition of the court in violation of European law‼ ️ Let’s remember the judgment in the case of “bloody tulips” and thousands of others. I will repeat it again Judges who only set aside sentences for this reason commit a disciplinary unlawful act in the sense of art. 107 USD For the activities of such officers of judges who arrange a “judgment on a judge” instead of the substantive investigation of the case
-Writed the judge of the Kamila Borszowska-Moszowska court, teacher at KSSIP and the Academy of Applied Sciences. Angelus Silesius.
The spokesperson for the CJEU can be careful with what he wants, because he has neither the ECJU in the issue of the Polish judiciary nothing to say.
Even this spokesperson, who considers the priority of the EU legislation above the Constitution, explains it obvious: judges who were appointed after 2017 are judges and cannot only be eliminated on the basis of the fact that they have undergone such and not a different nomination process.
Another thing is that if the spokesperson General of the ECJU would be found differently, for example, he would blow up the judiciary, because the judges are appointed in many countries without the participation of judges, and only politicians
– Bartosz Lewandowski wrote on X.
Long years of prison wait for those who thought the trade union would save them. The alibi in the form of the CJEU just fell. Mr. Bodnar, you can already prepare a toothbrush
– Jan Kanthak van Pis wrote on X.
The head of the National Council of the Judiciary draws attention to a very important detail when it comes to the opinions of the general spokesperson for the CJEU. At the end of his opinion, Dean Spielmann states that “every national court must have the right to independently assess the accuracy of the appointment of judges.” He also claims that EU legislation must have a priority over national law and its constitution.
This is not the CJEU ruling, but the opinion of the spokesperson for the CJEU. Regarding the judges of common courts, the CJEU or the ECtHR did not formulate a radical position. Nevertheless, the spokesperson allows the colleagues of the judge to investigate the “independence” of the judge’s judge, who in itself increases chaos, the risk of arbitrariness and the risk of the independence of the referee, who certainly contradicts the values that the spokesperson quotes. In short, judges can decide who remains and who is “defective”. Pure judge
-Notes on x Judge Dagmara pawłczyk-woicka, head of the national court register.
Although the Ombudsman’s opinion general of the ECJU is not a statement of the tribunal, it is a very clear signal that the way of thinking “bodnarists” and “Tuskowców” is not good and should not go like that. Listening to this voice would mean that the need to withdraw a scandalous project of segregation of legal judges, in accordance with Polish law and the Constitution after 2018. Will the rulers find sufficient self -retention instinct to do this and not add this? It’s hard to assess. However, if it is not in the name of survival, then at least they must finally give up the use of the story about Neo-Judge for the well-being of the citizens, which leads to the undermining of many sentences in things of ordinary citizens.
Read also: “Bodnarowcy” will chaos prepare in the judiciary? Important warnings for lawyers and judges. “Can lead to constitutional distribution”
KOAL/X
Source: wPolityce
Emma Matthew is a political analyst for “Social Bites”. With a keen understanding of the inner workings of government and a passion for politics, she provides insightful and informative coverage of the latest political developments.