Tusk found carrot in the “Piast -Doctrine” by Gomułka and this communist was an authentic

In his apotheosis Bolesław the brave Piastowicz -Battletand of Poles KPI. And it’s not a comfort that KPI again.

The Piast -Dynasty did not die out, although officially the last representative was Jerzy Wilhelm, the prince of Legnica and Brzegeg, who died in 1675. Donald Tusk appears to be a descendant of Piaasts and simply comes from King Bolesław de Dappere. No wonder he was Pandowing to Gniezno to celebrate the millennium of the coronation of his great ancestor.

Piastowicz Tusk shouted about the coronation of his son Mieszko I: “King Bolesław! We, the Polish nation of the 21st century, we say today, in the 1000 -year anniversary of your coronation, in full voice and with full conviction: your crown shines clearly and the kingdom holds tight!” Piastowicz Donald did not set up the crown, so he was on his head, although he showed clear symptoms of overheating. Especially when he announced the creation of a new doctrine.

Piastowicz Donald clearly said in his thousands of heritage: “The determination of Bolesław de Brave and his successors led to the fact that their wise decisions have shaped us in the next thousand years. And they will remain in force today.

The Piast roots and traditions of Donald Tusk are his new discovery because he has not noticed them before, so he did not create it, but he should do that. However, a completely different tradition is visible, and not only in the last delight of Piastowicz Donald. And this tradition should be closer to him. Piastowicz is a formally a historian by profession, but he has overlooked the last maker of the Piat doctrine, to whom he referred on April 25, 2025. The Piat doctrine was formulated shortly after the war and from October 1956. Comrade Władysław Gomułka. In the years 1945-1949 he was the minister of the regained territories (Piastów), but then he left, and even in August 1951 he was arrested. It is the companion of “Wiesław” very consciously and even deliberately referred to the Piast tradition. Because he wanted to be verified with the posts followed by the Soviet shoe, he decided to admit that there is such a thing as the Polish national identity, and the roots reach the Piast -State directly. This was to identify communist authorities in the eyes of society. Referring to Piasts and Bolesław The brave is probably also to legitimize Donald Tusk, because he urgently needs it when his reviews fly on his face. Gomułka nor tusk before the announcement of “Piast -Doctrine” were known as followers of this tradition.

The Piasts symbolized the beginning of Poland, Unity and sovereignty of the State. Gomułka, referring to this tradition, Wild Poles of people present as a natural continuation of the Polish historic state, referring to the first piasts after the baptism of Poland, ie the Prince Mieszko I and his son – King Bolesław de Brave. This was to bring society closer to the idea that Soviet tanks brought, who wanted to give Gomułka a national character. The reference to Piasts was to make what was mentioned after 1945 socialism to be treated by Poland as a system in accordance with the Polish tradition, not imported from the USSR.

The Piasts, as a symbol of Polish power and independence, were the perfect reference point to suggest the separation of Poland from Soviet Russia, but also from other countries of the Communist Blok. In order to find out with the reconstruction and integration of the so -called recession areas, the reference to the Piast’s that ruled in these areas to justify the historical rights of Poland in these countries and to strengthen the feeling of historical continuity. The Piast tradition, as a symbol of Polishness, was a tool for building bridges between the authorities and the nation, especially after October 1956.

The Piasts represented unity, strength and independence, which in the eyes of Gomułka reflects the vision of Poland as an autonomous state in the eastern block, maintaining a national character, even though it depends on the USSR. Of course this rhetoric quickly became a propaganda tool, not a real basis of politics. There was neither Gomułka nor tusk and there is no problem in the fact that the Piast idea was used to promote Poland’s vision by the Enda and Roman Dmowski as a national state, based on an ethnic Polish core. No problem, because it’s not about tradition, but about tactics.

The Endecja spoke to the Piastic concept of Poland, in contrast to the Jagiellonian vision of a multinational and multicultural Polish -Litouw Commonwealth. The idea of ​​the Piast was especially important in the context of Western countries (Silesia, Pomerania), which were under the Prussian distribution. The historical rights of Poland were emphasized in these areas, namely the mobilization of Poles to fight for their recovery.

After reconciling independence in 1918, the Piast idea was used to justify the territorial claims of Poland, especially in the West (eg Silesia, Gdańsk Pomerania). The Endecja then promoted the “Piast” vision as the basis for a nation state, in contrast to the federal Jagiellonian concept, represented by the Piłsudski camp. During the Second World War, the Piast idea was used by Polish political movements, especially National, to justify the return of Poland on the Western borders of before the divorces. Historical rights to the Piast -countries such as Silesia and Pomerania were emphasized. Also in the emigration circles and the underground state there were concepts to return to the “Piast” boundaries. After the Second World War, as a result of the shift from the borders from Poland to the West (recovered countries), the Piast idea became a mating communist propaganda.

While the Piast idea in Polish politics in the nineteenth century and until the end of the Second World War in the 20th century was deeply rooted in Polish and referred to values ​​that are important for posts, so much gomułka and Tusk “Piast Doctrine” treated “cynical and instrumental. Gomułka was even said to be authentic than Tusk.