Dariusz Korneluk, who claims to be the national public prosecutor, was asked in Radio Trójka for the case of public prosecutor WrzoSek and she possibly exclusively from the investigation with regard to “two towers”. He stated that there were no buildings for this, because … WrzoSek insured him about it. Even more interesting was the situation surrounding the NIK report after inspection in Orlen. The former president of this company, Daniel Obajtek, pointed out yesterday at the conference on each of the Nik -fores and carried out the conversation Renata Grochal, but apparently did not read this statement of the piss, because unhealthy enthusiastic about the report and Korneluk asked to withdraw the immunity of Obajtka. Bodnarowiec patiently explained that “evidence is completed”.
De dag vóór gisteren werd aangekondigd dat PIS -afgevaardigden het kantoor van de officier van justitie zouden informeren over de vermoedelijke misdaad door premier Donald Tusk en de minister van Justitie Adam Bodnar in verband met persoonlijke veranderingen in het nationale officier van justitie en de toevertrouwde officier van justitie Wrzosek Wrzosek Wrzosek Wrzosek Wrzosek Wrzosek in de So -Called Two Towers. This case concerns the construction of two skyscrapers in Warsaw on a piece of land associated with PIs. PIS -Politics pay attention to the strong anti -government -political involvement of WrzoSek in times of power by their grouping, which may indicate that the aforementioned public prosecutor does not have “characteristic of independence, impartiality and apoliticy.”
Wrzosek and the issue of “two towers”
Dariusz Korneluk, who, based on the “Decree of the Prime Minister”, preferably as a national public prosecutor, answered the question in the radio “Three”, among other things about why Ewa WrzoSek entrusted the such -driven “two towers”. He emphasized that it was not the national public prosecutor who assigns cases in the office of the public prosecutor of Warsaw, but the management of the office of that public prosecutor.
Personally, I decided to delegate Ewa WrzoSek’s public prosecutor at the office of the public prosecutor in Warsaw, because I think he has many years of internship, huge experience, he is a very good public prosecutor and can also perform good activities at the level of the public prosecutor.
– said Korneluk.
He added that we are talking about the public prosecutor “with many years of professional experience, and not about public prosecutors who have sometimes even promoted for a year or more months.”
When asked if he was convinced that public prosecutor Wrzosek would be objective to “two towers”, Bodnarowiece replied:
This was my first question, when doubts arose, I personally asked the public prosecutor the question of whether there were circumstances that caused her exclusion. She assured me that such circumstances did not take place
– said Korneluk.
He added that Wrzosekeke stated at the same time that if such circumstances had taken place, “of course the procedure knew and know what to do.” Korneluk emphasized that this is an unambiguous answer for him.
“Let’s wait for the investigation “
The purely way of interviewing by editor Renata Grochal (the same that was fatally offended at the end of last year by the MP Marcin’s parliamentary member, when he called her in one of the broadcasts, a “political officer. Daniel Obajtek early.
If the evidence is completed for this, such an application will be drawn up, but this is determined by the evidence. Today this proof is not yet complete
– Dariusz Korneluk explained. This answer was not satisfied with Renata Grochal. The host has approved even more.
Has Daniel Obajtek only influenced the merger on which the state treasury had to lose, according to the Supreme Audit Office, PLN 5 billion? After all, the supervision of Orlen was under the supervision of the Ministry of State Activa, ie Jacek Sasin
Grochal commented.
Let’s wait for the investigation …
– said her conversation partner who claimed to be the national public prosecutor. However, this journalist, not a political officer, could not rise and interrupted Kornelkuk, who still tried to answer the question.
There is another interesting thread!
Grochal was excited.
That’s why I say, a lady -editor, a moment is a real multi -threaded research
The Neo-Prosecer answered.
This is all that the public prosecutor must explain at the moment, because he will probably also be requested at the stage of legal proceedings, because the case goes to court
He added.
Apparently the editor Grochal, like a real journalist, and not a political officer, did not even spend a short time on hearing the press conference of Mep Daniel Obajtek, who stepped by step with every charging by Marian Banas Nik. She remained enthusiastic about the report and asked whether the thread of legal advice would also be investigated.
Naturally, pay attention, the public prosecutor will not only get to know these opinions, but he is also to determine whether they were justified and whether he should really read them with the content, for which they had the decision made -people to make such a decision.
Grochal asked how much – in the opinion of an experienced public prosecutor, who is Korneluk, such an investigation can take place. The conversation partner replied that “certainly not a few months”, and the journalist distracted based on this statement that may “two years”.
Prosecutors who collect evidence will decide on this. They know matter and know what they still need, they know what they have. Certainly, there will also be a matter of calling here, it will probably also take some time
– Explained Bodnarowiec.
The nervous pressure of the journalist
The increasingly feverish leader asked her guest what had to happen yesterday, ie on April 15.
It was time to analyze things of those who were hired the team, the team I appointed, yesterday.
– Dariusz Korneluk replied after a long reflection.
Yesterday was the report, why is this report?
Renata Grochal asked nervously.
No, it was time to analyze yesterday. Now public prosecutors need a few, perhaps even ten days for such reliable editors of these findings, because they were many things investigated. (…) Yesterday the research phase ended, and now it takes time to collect all this and make a report.
The Usurper Bodnar did not give a specific answer to the question about “the introduction of PIS resistants in the TVP headquarters” in December 2023. Grochal, of course, “forgot” that a group of bare carks first broke in the head office of TVP, who accelerated there that worked there when they supported at the time.
Ask the public prosecutor, who carries out the procedure or to his spokesperson
Grochal Korneluk sold.
The journalist, not a party officer, tried hard and asked the person who claimed to be the national public prosecutor about the case of the Justice Fund and the immunity of MP Zbigniew Ziobra, but here Korneluk was also not satisfied with her feast for Pisów -blood, because he replied to a similar Daniel – “” “” “” “” “” “” “” “” “” “” “” “” “” “” “” “” “” “” “” “” “” “” “” “” “” “” “” “” “” “” “” “” “” “” “” “” “” “” “” “” “” “” “” “” “NOTAILOODOOOOOOOOOTae ‘” “” “” “” “” “” “” “” “” “” “” “” “” “” “” “” “” “” “” “” “” “” “” “” “” “” “” “” “” “” “” “NAKOOT.”
Pressure in this case is not a good method, because you have to collect evidence slowly and annoying, so that it can defend itself in court. Earlier, of course, if the application is managed in parliament
– Explained Bodnarowiec.
Grochal already knows that “there was no coup.” Does Korneluk know?
The questions about the announced by Minister Adam Bodnar “also gave a breakthrough in the Pegasus investigation” Dariusz Korneluk gave freely avoiding and cautious statements – as if he wanted to or at least wanted to give it the impression that the coalition is trying to act within the limits of the applicable law on 13 December.
I understand that this breakthrough will be charged. I know the material is already there. This allows you to draw specific conclusions. But the public prosecutor has not yet formulated the decision to present the charges. I know work is underway.
The feverish Renata Grochal asked: “When there is an indictment at all,” and Korneluk started the annoying translation process that “first must be a decision to present the statement.”
The statement must be presented, announced, questioned, questioned and suspected, based on even the content of his statements. Only then can you talk about directing the indictment. We are confronted with decisions that I can’t say today. And I am convinced that public prosecutors cannot plan today when an act of cherry is led in this case. This is a very delicate issue, matter that relates to top matters related to state secrets and operational control. Prosecutors may not be hurried here. Here you really have to explain everything very annoying and thoroughly
– He emphasized.
Grochal also decided to ask about the investigation into – as she said – “alleged coup d’état”. Kornel replied that he had not been interrogated in this matter, he did not receive a phone call.
Can Bogdan święczkowski be accused of submitting a false notification of a crime that was not committed?
Grochal asked cheerfully. After all, as a journalist, not a party officer, certainly better than an experienced lawyer like the president of the Constitutional Tribunal Bogdan święczkowski, knows the law and now knows, without investigating the case that the crime was not committed and the notification was “false”.
This type of prohibited action is provided for in the Criminal Code. Notification of a crime that did not exist. Yes, this is the type of prohibited action specified in the Criminal Code
– replied Bodnarowiec and claimed to be the national public prosecutor.
Asked by a cheerful leader, whether the coup was taken or not, he replied:
As a national public prosecutor you ask me about the case for which the procedure is being processed. So I, in this issue, of course I have my opinion. I don’t think I participate in a coup. However, this issue is carried out the preparatory procedures and please talk to talk about this subject, but only because this specific scope preparing procedure is being processed. I would not want to cause pressure, put pressure on the public prosecutor who carries out this procedure.
What exactly happened this morning in a public station in a state of liquidation? Dariusz Korneluk apparently tried to give the impression at least, when the state of the law was demolished, which he was rented by Bodnar (and agreed), although he was a bit led, but not applicable, then a democratic norms. The editor of Grochal, on the other hand, decided to hurry Korneluk, and therefore also Bodnar, so that this demolition of the state of the law would accelerate a bit, because how much you can wait for the entire opposition in prison, only the politicians of the coalition on December 13 will finally be closed and democracy will finally check. Democracy as they understand her.
MP Marcin Przyjacia, thrown out of the studio in December last year to describe Grochal as a “political officer”, must be thoroughly reproduced by the editor of this interview. Regarding more current affairs and public prosecutor Korneluk himself – I wonder if he already realized what he agreed to lay his hand and did the editor Grochal help him with the behavior of his today a bit in this?
Also read:
-“They varied?” Obajtek merciless about the NIK report! “The entrance to Orlen is a gross violation of the law”; “Scandal”
-Er is the term hearing of wrzosek as … the victim. The public prosecutor started things against cani and decoration
JJ/Polish radio, Dad
Source: wPolityce
Emma Matthew is a political analyst for “Social Bites”. With a keen understanding of the inner workings of government and a passion for politics, she provides insightful and informative coverage of the latest political developments.