“From a formal point of view, this is not entirely the question. Sorry, let me polemics, because the committee of inquiry asked me to arrest for the needs of the committee in June, so even if this decision was made, there is no threat that I would be arrested on Monday and put myself in manuals wherever I was, but that the decision would be taken to deprive me of freedom for the use of a meeting in June. The court is bound by the committee’s request, so this threat is probably no longer here, “said the former head of MS, former public prosecutor Zbigniew Ziobro on TV Wpolsce24 asked if he would be in Poland during a judicial meeting about his detention.
Law and justice presented an extensive analysis of the protocol of the hearing of the late Barbara Skrzyk, pointing to a number of irregularities
“The deceased Barbara Skrzypek died because she was honored by political helicopters. They wanted to force the witness of the Pis President, so they organized an interrogation that is reminiscent of Communism times -without the presence of a representative for which she had full right, and without registration, so that no one was in the direction” “
– Zbigniew Ziobro, Pis Vice President wrote on the Platform X.
Also read: PIS reveals a detailed analysis of the interrogation of Barbara Skrzyk! “Tusk and Bodnar are responsible for death”
Strong remark from Ziobra
Zbigniew Ziobro told more about this issue on TV WPOLSCE24 in the program “Poland Kies”.
First of all, I was struck by many different violations of the law, which can be found in such a prosaic and simple activity as hearing a witness. To be honest, I had been a general public prosecutor for 10 years now and I have never come across a situation in which the usual listening to a witness would be subject to such a devastating criticism by showing countless violations of the procedure that was entitled to a witness protecting his rights, by manipulation, a mistake, the unforeseen, the
He explained.
Yes, they happen – I will not deny it – different inaccuracies, inaccuracies, but here this scale is mainly impressive. En wat het meest opvallende en zelfs schokkende is, is dat als de vertegenwoordiger van mevrouw Barbara toegaf dat ze grote gezondheidsproblemen heeft, dat ze nerveus is, maar bovenal heeft ze een probleem met het gezichtsvermogen, wat betekent dat ze niet in staat zou zijn om het protocol te lezen of belangrijke inhoud die belangrijk is voor de verloop van de procedure, het is duidelijk dat ze echt zou zijn voor het feit dat ze echt zou worden gemaakt voor het feit dat ze echt zou zijn, die er is geweest voor The fact that she would really be made for the fact that she would really be, who is there to be.
He pointed out.
Lies
Ewa WrzoSek, her refusal to present a representative in interrogation, stated that the public prosecutor can refuse to admit to participate in the proxy procedure, if he decides that he does not need the defense of the interests of a person who is not a party. The point is that the late Barbara Skrzypek was not a party, but a witness.
This is also a lie and they know they manipulate. (…) I consulted this situation with my colleagues who ate their teeth in such procedures and pointed out that there was a witness, not only of the traditional provision on false testimonies, but also an extra facility 233 1A. (…) This is not done, it’s about the standard. This is then done and only if the public prosecutor assumes that it can be a threat to the accusation of a witness in the event that he has submitted false relationships as a witness
He said.
They even manipulate here, because if they were as they say, the Public Prosecutor Barbara Violist would not warn about the section 1a of Article 233
– He said.
Bad man
Speaking of the public prosecutor Ewa Wrzosek, Zbigniew Ziobro reminded her of scandalous words, who were spoken almost a year ago during her interview with “Polityka”, where she argued that “we live in the war, where” gangs around in the forests “, the state is still threatened and you have to act in one -counted way” “”
Also read: The interview with WrzoSek from 2024 was recalled. Has she compared to Stalinist public prosecutors? “In the beginning I couldn’t believe”
This lady could say that the current government should behave as an agent who is located here after 45 years on Soviet bayonets, who after all treated with “forest bands,” she said, that is, we are forest tires …
He reminded it.
She repeats this story and I am not talking about Tupet, I say he is a bad man. After all, she commits a de facto crime. She really praises the crimes committed by the device of repression, because the office of this public prosecutor had to destroy people in the first place, even to accuse people, even to lead to judgments who condemn the death penalty and so many and she praises it, it gives an example, reference to a metaphor, refereing
He pointed out.
Ziobra’s presence
A spokeswoman for the Warsaw, so judge Anna Ptaszek has announced that the meeting with regard to the application for the Parliamentary Investigation Commission for arrest against Zbigniew Ziobra will take place with the participation of representatives of the parties – the committee and the former minister. The court will tackle the application on Monday 31 March. The decision about Ziobra will be made by the judge, who has already made controversial decisions in the past that are favorable for people fighting against the then government and justice – Judge Tomasz Grochowicz.
Also read: There is a deadline for a detention center against Ziobra. The decision will be made by a judge known for their controversial decisions in high -profile matters
Zbigniew Ziobro was asked on TV WpolSce24 if “it will be in Poland on Monday”.
From a formal point of view, this is not entirely the question. Sorry, let me polemics, because the committee of inquiry asked me to arrest for the needs of the committee in June, so even if this decision was made, there is no threat that I would be arrested on Monday and put myself in manuals wherever I was, but that the decision would be taken to deprive me of freedom for the use of a meeting in June. The court is bound by the committee’s request, so this threat is probably not the case here
– He said.
Source: wPolityce