Bodnar hits Błaszczak! He accuses the former head of the Ministry of National Defense … “Destroy the basis of our safety”. And what were the defense plans on the Vistula line?

Mrs Adam Bodnar’s head said that the attitude of Mariusz Błaszczak (PIs) is ‘incomprehensible to him’. He emphasized that there is an action for the protection of classified information and “It cannot be randomly considered that public opinion should learn about something.” “This is the destruction of the basic principles of our safety,” he added.

The former Minister of National Defense Mariusz Błaszczak heard absurd allegations in the public prosecutor, including exceeding the rights in connection with the declassification of the part of the “Warta” Armed Forces plan; He is confronted with a maximum of 10 years in prison. Pis politician did not argue; In his opinion, the allegations are “unfounded”. He argued that he declared fragments of the document from the archive, so that it was impossible to return to the concept of “Poland’s defense on the Vistula line” and that he would do the same again.

This attitude is so incomprehensible to me for me

– Said Adam Bodnar Minister of Justice on Friday, who was asked by Dad during a press conference after a meeting with the public prosecutors of the Białystok region.

Bodnar noted that – as a general public prosecutor – “has access to various classified documents with different openness clauses” and – as he emphasized – “for him the action against the protection of classified information almost holiness.”

He pointed out that the law introduces very strict rules for dealing with individual types of documents, and also introduces strict access rules and to explain them. He reminded that the law also includes a provision that persons are authorized to declassify. He said that these are people who have undergone appropriate procedures or have a specific political status in the state and this authorizes them to gain access to these documents.

You can’t, just like that, random that: “I think the public opinion should find out.” No, it cannot be permission with such action, because in this way we destroy the basis of our safety, and in the situation in which we are, attention to the confidentiality of communication in the context of this all classified documents is particularly important, especially important. That is why these arguments absolutely do not reach me in any way of the minister

He noticed.

The case concerns the statement and subsequent public disclosure in September 2023 by Błaszczak part of the document of the plan of the use of the Polish forces “Warta”. Referring to this document, he accused PO politicians that they had planned at the time of their rule in the case of an invasion of the state defense on the Vistula line and “half of the country devotes to the attacker.” On July 17, 2024, the head of SKW, General Jarosław Stróżyk, submitted a report in the office of the public prosecutor about the suspicion of a crime by the former head of the Ministry of National Defense.

According to the office of the public prosecutor, Blaszczak, “in the decision to eliminate the confidentiality clause on the plan of the operational planning documents to use the Polish forces (…) ‘, acted contrary to the law, because despite the fact that they were in the military historic office in that statute of the Classified Conditions for the Classified Conditions for the Classified Conditions in the Classified Conditions. To attract criminal liability in Błaszczak – on 6 March he withdrew the PIS MP Immunitet.

I had the right, but also the obligation that the archive documents would be released

Blaszczak argued.

Because of these archive documents that could be decorated in the military historic office, I was primarily intended not to return the Vistula line. That every piece of Polish territory would be defended by soldiers from the Polish army

He added.

Bodnar defends WrzoSek again

The Public Prosecutor, who interrogates a witness who does not intend to accuse, cannot, but does not have to let the representative of this person participate in these activities – emphasized the head of MS, public prosecutor -general Adam Bodnar. He added that in such situations some public prosecutors agree to the participation of the proxy, not others.

Bodnar was asked about the issue of interrogation on March 12 – as a witness – Barbara Skrzypek by public prosecutor Ewa WrzoSek; The audition concerned the case of Srebra and the construction of the SO -Called two towers. Three days after him, a long -term employee of Pis President Jarosław Kaczyński died. According to the autopsy, the cause of the violinist was a huge heart attack.

Pis politicians believe, together with the party leader, that there is a connection between the death of the former employee of Kaczyński and the interrogation of her on 12 March about Srebra. They point out that the violinistic representative is not admitted to the interrogation. On Tuesday afternoon, the Procuror’s Office district in Warsaw published an anonymous protocol of the violinistic interrogation. It shows that it took more than four hours and was ordered during a short break. Public Prosecutor WrzoSek emphasized that the interrogation took place in a friendly atmosphere and no comments were made.

Bodnar was asked for this issue in Bialystok on Friday.

I am all that I can say is that the provisions only require a representative if it is made on the basis of art. 183 of the Criminal Procedure Act, ie only if a person interviewed as a witness can be charged

– Answer the Minister of Justice. He explained that it was a situation in which the public prosecutor assumes that this interrogation can lead to a change when it comes to the procedural role of that person.

However, if the interrogation is not made in this mode, the public prosecutor has freedom and there are public prosecutors who allow representatives in such situations, there are officers of justice who do not allow proxies in such situations. And it seems to me that my only role is just a presentation that the public prosecutor is freedom in such a situation, but I would not in any way want to assess the behavior of the public prosecutor in this situation

Said Bodnar.

According to art. 87 With the Code of Criminal Procedure “a person who is not a party can name a representative if his interests require this in the pending procedure.” The public prosecutor may refuse to allow such a representative to participate in the procedure if he “decides that he does not need the defense of the interests of the person who is not a party.”

Bodnar was also asked about a letter he had tackled to the chairman of the European Parliament Roberta Mesola to take steps to assess the behavior of PIS -P Jacek decorations to the public prosecutor Ewa Wrzosek.

This recording that we have all seen, in which such a sort of insisting takes place in the context of the possible use of physical violence, there are such very unsympatic words with regard to public prosecutor Ewa WrzoSek. In my opinion, these are behaviors that are simply not worth a parliamentarian in the world, who presents Poland in the international arena, in the European Parliament

– Bodnar told journalists.

He expressed the hope that the correct procedures for ethical standards would be implemented by the President of the EP.

It seems to me that these acts can be assessed in this way, from the point of view of certain ethical standards that we could expect in the behavior of parliamentarians

He assessed.

Bodnar also noted that his role – if the public prosecutor demanded “” public prosecutors who are threatened, who are in an unusual situation, to inform for this standard that if someone serves the state, he must be respected by others. “

Also read:

– Only with us. Who is the Błaszczak, Lt. Col. Maxjan, who was the case? “He wrote political calls, it’s not impartial”

– Blaszczak after interrogation: the truth will win. The regime that is in power will fall. Karol Nawrocki guarantees that the Vistula line will not return

TKWL/Dad