Hot exchange of sentences! Dubois: “Wrzosek did not provide her safety.” Lewandowski: “The views of the public prosecutor are clear”

Mec. Jacek Dubois tried to defend the public prosecutor Ewa Wrzosek, with whom he participated in the hearing of the Late Barbara Skrzypek. Although the lawyer Gerald Birgfellnyryr argued that WrzoSek did not know the views, he stated that “she did not provide her safety.” “There was something tragic because the witness died, but such things happen,” he said exceptionally shocking! “How to talk about impartiality here in a situation where the suspect and indicated in the report is the head of the opposition party, who has publicly reluctance the public prosecutor and has often expressed it,” scored Bartosz Lewandowski.

Dubois vs. Lewandowski

Extremely interesting – and important thereof – The exchange of sentences took place on Polsat News when the conversation was invited Bartosz Lewandowski (known as a defender of PIS MP Marcin Romanowski) and Jacek DuboisThe representative of the Austrian businessman Gerald Birgfellnyr, who was a lawyer in the interrogation of the late Barbara Skrzyk at the office of the public prosecutor in Warsaw, three days before her death!

One of the most important questions about this outskirts why Ewa WrzoSek decided that she was able to refuse Barbara Skrzypek support from her lawyer during the interrogation lately. Mec. Bartosz Lewandowski pointed out that in the provisions regarding the admission of the lawyer to interrogate the client as a witness, there is … about the interest, very widely understood!

In my career I met once when the public prosecutor did not agree with the representative of the representative

– He said. As he noted, in the report of the hearing of the Late Barbara Skrzykk reads that the correct order will be issued later.

I don’t know if it has been released

– He added, indicating that the representative’s rule is the participation of such activities.

Mec. Jacek Dubois admitted that in the first auditions in the SO -Called “two towers”, there were proxies with witnesses and claimed that it was a legal interest and a possible exposure to criminal liability.

“Public Prosecutor WrzoSek did not provide her safety.

The interviewer asked an accurate question why there was no … Recorder. The answer of lawyer Gerald Birgfellner was disarmed!

Ask the public prosecutor. This is usually 50 out of 50, in the 70 percent district there are prosecutors who only prefer to ask, there are people who feel good on the keyboard. This is probably a very individual matter

He said.

Dubois added that such questions were a matter of “post factum” and admitted that it was better if there was a representative of the late Barbara Skrzyk, so that there would be a recorder and that the recordings would be made.

Only in practice it is not practiced

He added.

Mec. Lewandowski agreed with the words of Dubois that “in fact many activities are carried out by the public prosecutor” and “this situation does not differ from other things, it must be admitted fairly.” But?

I think that in such investigations and such accusations, which are publicly formulated against the referee’s public prosecutor and her media statements, all these activities must be registered in the form of audio video

– The lawyer emphasized. All the more – he argued – it should be in matters that concentrate the attention of the public.

The interviewer asked Jacek Dubois or Ewa Wrzosek made a mistake.

These were not mistakes, this is common. I’ll say that way. Public Prosecutor WrzoSek did not provide her safety. She really behaved without complaints during these interrogations

– the defender of the Austrian businessman answered.

And this was not the mistake of the public prosecutor, because she really did it in a certain way. There was something tragic because the witness died, but such things happen. People die when leaving the hospital or ex -officio. Nothing happened in this matter that could cause excessive stress

Dubois added, but surprising are arguments!

Read more: There is a protocol of the hearing of the Late Barbara Skrzypek! He was personally made by … the public prosecutor WrzoSek, who interviewed

A Politized Public Prosecutor!

Mec. Lewandowski replied that “the public prosecutor, in accordance with the Code of Criminal Procedure, but also the law on the office of the public prosecutor, is impartial.”

And how you can talk here about impartiality in a situation in which the suspect and indicated in the report is the head of the opposition party, which the public prosecutor has publicly a great restraint and has repeatedly expressed it. So in my opinion this is a misunderstanding and even for the well -being of the image of the public prosecutor, such an investigation should not be carried out by people who publicly express their political emotions, political sympathies and political anti -paths. I think it’s really harmful

He pointed out.

What does Dubois say?

I don’t know the political views of Mrs. Wrzoseke. I saw Mrs. WrzoSek in all demonstrations, where I also participated in the defense of free courts, so I know that Mrs. WrzoSek defended the Constitution and acted against everyone who violates the Constitution. However, I do not know if she is voting for the left side or liberals or someone else. I know that she was against the policy of the previous power with regard to the violation of the Constitution

– He said at the same time and complained that his client’s case “was buried under the carpet in 2019 as a result of the striking violations of the law.”

My client waited for five years to look for justice and now Mrs. WrzoSek began to explain very efficiently and take real actions to clarify this issue. And now I will say yes, I represent Mr Birgfellnyr in this matter, and I make no worldwide assessments and from the point of view of my client after six years of the publicized public prosecutor, who hid this case

He added.

Each of us has viewed and now can someone be objective about these views or not? And now, from the point of view of my observation during those hearings in which, after the course of these interrogations, I did not see the way of behavior against the parties, I did not see that the public prosecutor preferred someone

He defended WrzoSek.

“The political views of the public prosecutor are clear “

The defense of public prosecutor Wrzoseek carried out by Dubois, who crushed, which remembered some facts, the other of the lawyer.

Let me remind you that the Wrzosek public prosecutor seems to be publicly encouraged and encouraged to vote for one of the Civic Coalition in the European Parliament. It was a pretty loud case in which she simply encouraged or promoted such a candidate, who was even asked the public prosecutor. Here the political views of the public prosecutor are clear

– Lewandowski emphasized and at the same time remembered that in the SO -Called the case “Two Towers” was previously maintained by the decision of the public prosecutor and the judge associated with the surroundings of free courts ruled on this!

Would we like that if a patron, for example, wanted a public prosecutor who publicly expressed his position and, for example, support for Jarosław Kaczyński in an election? It seems to me that it would be clear that such a public prosecutor just couldn’t do such a case

He added.

Mrs. Barbara Skrzyk was with a proxy. The Proxy has not requested a postponement, he has not submitted a request to exclude the public prosecutor, did not submit a complaint to prevent him from preventing him and did not ask him to be suspended so that he could. That is, Mrs. Skrzypek’s representative has not exercised any rights.

– He tried to answer.

As you can see, Mr. laughs Patron no longer, as when he described the interrogation of “Mrs. Basia” on the X and jokes the “ear of the public prosecutor”.

Also read:

– There is the full content of President Duda’s letter to Tusk about the death of B. Skrzypek! 7 important questions. “Has PK received under supervision?”

Dubois wrote when Barbara Skrzypek was questioned! “I wonder what you feel now?”; “A proud Mr. Patron?”

Dubois described the course of the interrogation of Barbara Skrzyk. Bochenek: Has the Heathreat read the protocol and Mr Dubois “arranged” it in sentences?

– Public Prosecutor WrzoSek received protection and fears with lawsuits! Also for providing submissions. “Are you not working?”

– The Ombudsman spoke about the death of Barbara Skrzypek. “It seems reasonable to introduce legal reviews”

Olnk