Barbara Skrzykk was open during interrogation; She did not raise any objections about the form and length of the interrogation, she did not want her lawyer to participate in the interrogation -Jacek Dubois, the representative of the Austrian businessman Gerald Birgfellnyr, argued in Neo -TVEb -info. The message about interrogating the violinist was published on her website by the Procurutor’s Office district in Warsaw.
At the beginning of February, the office of the public prosecutor in Warsaw started an investigation into bringing Birgfelller into a negative removal of ownership compared to no less than EUR 1.3 million by misleading it. It is about the construction of two skyscrapers on the Srebra -plot in Warsaw.
On March 12, at the headquarters of the Public Prosecution Service of Warsaw, Barbara Skrzyk, one of the nearest employees of Pis President Jarosław Kaczyński, was questioned in this case. Member of the Board of Directors of the Srebna Company and the Board of Directors of the Lech Kaczyński Institute. Barbara Skrzykek died on March 15.
PIS politicians pay attention to the fact that the representative of Barbara Skrzypek, Krzysztof Gotkowicz could not participate in the interrogation. Pis President Jarosław Kaczyński estimated that the relationship between the death of a woman and her earlier interrogation is a “completely obvious relationship”. The interrogation was led by public prosecutor Ewa Wrzosek, who emphasizes that Barbara Skrzyk and her representative did not submit any comments about the course of the interrogation, and the interrogation itself would take place in a friendly atmosphere. The office of the public prosecutor in Warsaw indicated in a Monday announcement that the violinist did not raise any objections with regard to the form and length of the interrogation, and in addition to reading problems it did not report any health ailments.
Jacek Dubois was asked about the circumstances of interrogation in the evening on TVP info. He was present during the interrogation as the representative of the Austrian businessman.
Dubois reported that the violinist was an “extremely open” person during interrogation.
She immediately said that she was probably at the office of the public prosecutor for the first time, she spoke openly about it and it was the subject of such a human discussion. (…) She started talking to me, asking for different things; We started talking about travel problems
He reported. According to Dubois, after interrogation, the violinist also had to talk to the public prosecutor WrzoSek who led the case, as he reserve as only socially.
According to the lawyer, Barbara Skrzypek never expressed the wish for her representative to participate, lawyer Krzysztof Gotkowicz, nor has it raised objections about the form and length of the interrogation.
Her representative was a floor lower and did not see him contacting him. (…) There was no application for a break, there was no complaint about the protocol. That is why, as I heard on Saturday, that the public prosecutor Wrzoseke is guilty of something, I was stupidly beaten
– Dubois said.
In his opinion, the violinist was not in the way of a good hearing of the witness.
Of what she said (Barbara Skrzyk – Note of Pap) and what was included in the protocol, nothing was followed and this protocol was signed by her and these statements were made, if I remember, in the presence of the patron
– He said. In his opinion: “We have two reality – the reality that took place in the Khotyn room and the reality, about which Mr. Jarosław Kaczyński talks about.”
Mec. Dubois assessed that the allegations with regard to the course of the violinist are raised by “people who have not participated in this interrogation and who in no way verified what happened to the people there were.” He also emphasized that the violinist was questioned as a witness, “on the occasion of knowledge or events she saw or heard, but this did not go to her in any way.”
“Poor health of the witness “
Something very different from what Dubois said results from the statement of the representative of the Late Barbara Skrzykk.
The public prosecutor who carried out the interrogation in the hallway refused to allow me to act
– We read in communication. The lawyer emphasizes that he justified the necessity of the representative of the representative with the poor state of the health of the witness, as well as the presence of two representatives who know. Barbara Skrzyk also informed about her health problems, but MOC.
Read more: The representative of Mrs. Barbara Skrzypek was refused to participate twice in activities! “I pointed to the poor health of the witness”
“Damaged by forest and physical “
Dubois and Wrzosek claim that the hearing of the violinist took place in a pleasant atmosphere. But it could be, because after the interrogation the violinist would say that “she was destroyed physically and mentally.”
Let Barbara Skrzypek experienced a lot before he questioned what would happen. We know very well that after this interrogation she returned home and fell asleep for four hours in clothing. She told herself that she was physically and mentally destroyed after this interrogation
– Pis spokesperson Rafał Bochenek said on television Wpolska24.
Read more: Only with us. Bochenek: Barbara Skrzypek said she was physically and mentally damaged after this interrogation
Public prosecutor
On Monday evening the message about the interrogation was published by the Procurutor’s Office district in Warsaw. According to the 9 -pages of the Audit report, the procedural activities started at 10.00 and ended at 14.40. A break of a few minutes was ordered during the interrogation. As reported, in the interrogation of the clerk of the case of public prosecutor Ewa WrzoSek, the proxy of the victim, the Austrian businessman Gerald Birgfellnyr – lawyer Jacek Dubois and Adv. Krystian Lasik.
According to the information in the report of the interrogation of the witness, he and his witness as a representative of her Krzysztof Gotkowicz, who applied for admission to interrogation, stating the widely interpreted interest of the witness. The public prosecutor based on art. 87 Parish 3 of the Criminal Law Act refused admission to interrogate the representative of a witness, given that this does not require the defense of the interests of the person who is not a party. Orally justified her position, which was noted in the interrogation report
– The office of the public prosecutor said in a communiqué.
It emphasized that after the end of the promotion the protocol was read and signed by all persons who participated in the interrogation, and the witness left the office of the public prosecutor in the presence of Adv. Krzysztof Gotkowicz, who waited for the end of the campaign in the building of the public prosecutor.
The witness has not raised any objections with regard to the shape and length of the interrogation. Apart from reading problems, the witness has not reported any health ailments.
– indicated.
It was also pointed out that, according to the criminal proceedings, the recognition of the victim’s lawyer to question the witness he asked is the responsibility of the public prosecutor, while the representative of the witness can question an exception and lies on the responsibility of the public prosecutor.
The office of the public prosecutor in Warsaw also announced that in the late evening on March 15, 2025 she heard about the death of Barbara Skrzykek about the death of Barbara Skrzypek. The body of the deceased with the materials of the case was secured.
Led by the reasons for maintaining impartiality, sent the office of the public prosecutor in Warsaw to the office of the regional public prosecutor in Warsaw to appoint a public prosecutor outside the Warsaw district to make a decision about further procedural activities
– explained.
Kk/dad
Source: wPolityce
Emma Matthew is a political analyst for “Social Bites”. With a keen understanding of the inner workings of government and a passion for politics, she provides insightful and informative coverage of the latest political developments.