“It is not the first time that a lie supports the lawlessness and the wickedness of this power. He does not behave like a professor, but as a legal being. Do they pay him or do they promise him? ” – The former Minister of Justice and former public prosecutor General Zbigniew Ziobro, who responded to the theories of Professor Zbigniew ćwiąkalski, a former public prosecutor.
Former public prosecutor General Professor Zbigniew ćwiąkalski in an interview with WP.pl tried to explain the decision of the Neo-Pokornaturure that took the late survey Barbara Skrzykek, under the presence of her lawyer.
Translation of ćwiąkalski
Professor ćwiąkalski argued that the presence of a lawyer during interrogation is only justified in situations where there is a chance to change the procedural roles, ie when a witness can become a suspect.
The proxy is permitted when it is possible in the perspective of changing the process roles, ie when he can become a suspect. It was clearly said that she was not in danger of criminal liability
– He said in an interview with Wp.pl.
98 percent witnesses are questioned without the participation of a representative “and is only permitted in exceptional cases. – The decision of the public prosecutor does not increase any objections. If PIS wanted a representative in every situation, he could change the code. He was eight years old
He argued.
Ziobra’s answer
Former Justice Minister and former public prosecutor -General Zbigniew Ziobro in the entry on social media responded to the theories of Profiąkalski.
Ćwiąkalski lies and claims that the proxy is only allowed when a witness can be a suspect, ie exceptional. He knows it’s not true
He assessed.
It is not the first time that a lie supports the lawlessness and the wickedness of this power. He does not behave like a professor, but as a legal being. Do they pay him or do they promise him?
He asked.
Also read:
– Jarosław Kaczyński on television Wpolsce24: Barbara Skrzykk was refused the participation of a lawyer. She knew who this public prosecutor was
– The representative of Mrs. Barbara Skrzypek was refused to participate twice in activities! “I pointed to the poor health of the witness”
– The second lawyer of the interrogation of Barbara Skrzyk? We know who sent Giertych! Krystian Lasik was, among other things, Defender … Mraza!
AS/X/WP.PL
Source: wPolityce
Emma Matthew is a political analyst for “Social Bites”. With a keen understanding of the inner workings of government and a passion for politics, she provides insightful and informative coverage of the latest political developments.