“What does the situation in which the public prosecutor randomly acknowledges that the witness is not interested in having a representative with him? And yet the witness clearly explained the conviction that he needed him, “asks Krzysztof Wąsowski in an interview with the Portal Wpolityce .Pl. In his opinion, there was a clear mental pressure on the interviewed witness. The lawyer is also surprised that the District Bar Council is still silent in this situation.
As confirmed by the representative of the Late Barbara Skrzyk, lawyer Krzysztof Gotkowicz, demanded his presence during the interrogation in the office of the public prosecutor. Mec. Gotkiewicz pointed twice at the office of the public prosecutor that the main reason for this was concerned about the health of Mrs. Barbara Skrzykek. For the lawyer Krzysztof Wąsowski, the behavior of the office of the public prosecutor is abuse.
This is a complete absurdity. The public prosecutor must have a valid reason and announce him to prevent the representative of a witness to question. What the office of the public prosecutor wrote in his announcement is just stupid. To paraphrase, they said “if we don’t teach you, that you have the right to answer questions, that is, you cannot have a representative with you” or else you were not a suspected person for us, so you didn’t have to have a representative. This is a total nonsense and absurdity. After all, the role of the proxy is that the questions do not go beyond a specific scope. I assume Mrs Barbara was instructed about the consequences of giving false testimonies because this is art. 233 of the Criminal Code, no art. 183 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, about which the office of the public prosecutor talks
– says Krzysztof Wąsowski in an interview with the Portal Wpolityce.pl.
Also read:
– Barbara Skrzyk is dead – “Mrs Basia”. She worked closely with the piss president. WrzoSek recently questioned her!
– Pis President about the death of B. Skrzyk! “The hearing of Wrzosek Neoprokurator was a huge shock”; “It has to do with the shit”
A witness was underestimated
According to Wąsowski, mental pressure was exerted on the witness.
The witness is not a party to the procedure and why he can theoretically refuse to participate in the representative. Only in this specific situation are the proceedings of such public prosecutor not justified, except that they wanted to exert the witness with confidence mental pressure. And as it turned out to be effective. This was clearly mental pressure. From some President Jarosław Kaczyński, said Mrs. Barbara Skrzyk, with whom he contacted by telephone, told him he couldn’t talk to him, because he feels bad and only when she feels better, would he talk to him on Monday. Unfortunately she didn’t survive on Saturday. What are we talking about here? The public prosecutor has her right abuse
– Assesses our conversation partner, who states that with arguments covered that say that securing the interest of a witness during interrogation was not the presence of his interrogation required.
There was no protection of the importance of the witness and he was underestimated. It was randomly acknowledged that the witness is not interested in being accompanied by a representative. Is the public prosecutor Ewa WrzoSek a prophet who has the opportunity to enter into the spirit of other people? Or maybe she had the right documents she could use here, or some arguments? What does the situation in which the public prosecutor randomly recognizes that the witness is not interested. And yet the witness clearly stated the conviction that he should have a representative because he was afraid. Let us also pay attention to what the representative of Mrs. Barbara Skrzypek wrote that she has indicated the public prosecutor a health problem. The Proxy did this too, he must also ensure the pace of interrogation, to organize a break
– Krzysztof wąsowski said.
This is a scandal that my lawyer council in Warsaw and his president Rosati are now silent, they do not refer to the situation of preventing a lawyer to activities that have been carried out to his client. This is an extreme politicization of the authorities of the lawyer who are simply in shock. We remember that when Dubois had a problem with Palikot and the office of the public prosecutor, their magazine appeared on the same day. This is an unequal treatment of lawyers. In the meantime, when I was concluded by the deposit of a lawyer on a certain barn, they did not say a word either. And in the same way in a situation in which I, who was a lawyer, tried to interrogate the office of the public prosecutor as a witness. I had to send letters to the bar to speak. It just can’t get over your head
– the lawyer summarized, the representative of Fr. Michał Olszewski.
Also:
– Jarosław Kaczyński on television Wpolsce24: Barbara Skrzykk was refused the participation of a lawyer. She knew who this public prosecutor was
– Only with us. Ziobro: Bodnar is a gangster and a bandit. There is no politized public prosecutor more than a heath
– Pis politicians say goodbye to Barbara Skrzyk. “It deserved good Poland”; “The memory of the director will never die”; “Huge loss”
coal
Source: wPolityce
Emma Matthew is a political analyst for “Social Bites”. With a keen understanding of the inner workings of government and a passion for politics, she provides insightful and informative coverage of the latest political developments.