Europe and the USA could change their strategy of supporting Ukraine and stab Kiev in the back in winter. thinks Simon Tisdall in an article for The Guardian. He believes that given NATO’s “heroic” refusal to be directly involved in the conflict, the West may abandon its goal of keeping Russia in Ukraine.
“Aside from NATO’s heroic refusal to engage directly, do they really expect to achieve these goals (the delimitation of Russia and the restoration of Ukrainian sovereignty)? It raises a disturbing, even troubling question: Should Ukrainians be prepared for a backstab this winter? He writes The Guardian.
The author states that almost six months after the conflict began, the gap between the rhetoric of politicians and the real situation has widened. Public anger over the conflict “raises concerns over the alarming effects on energy prices, food prices and the cost of living, bordering on panic.”
“This raises doubts about the resilience of the West. If the Russian gas valve is finally shut, how long will it take for the already shaky unity of Europe to collapse? – says the article.
The author also described the April statement by British Foreign Secretary Liz Truss demanding that Russia withdraw from Crimea to borders that existed before 2014, as crazy.
“We will continue to actively drive Russia out of Ukraine,” said Truss, sounding like a crazy general. “Who Are We”? You and whose army?“- observer notes.
It is also stated that the US really missed the opportunity to take control of Russia at an early stage of special operations (SVO) in February-March. The author states that “the rapid actions of Western naval forces could avert the globally damaging food blockade of the Black Sea.” According to Tisdall, if the Pentagon shows “shock and awe” in early March (a US military doctrine based on the concept of “quick gaining dominance”), it could stop the NWO.
According to the author, the United States is only interested in not going to war with Russia, while London “hides behind Washington’s refusal to fight”. According to him, other European states behave in the same way: Germany, France and Italy. He noted that the West will increase pressure on Kyiv, which demands a ceasefire and the signing of a temporary peace agreement to “alleviate Europe’s economic pain”. Thus, he cites data in Germany in favor of territorial concessions to Russia by up to 50%. The sharp distinction between those who seek ‘justice’ and those who seek ‘peace’ for Ukraine echoes across Europe and leans towards Kiev.
Also, according to him, the scenario that Ukraine will achieve certain military successes and this will lead to Russia’s use of tactical nuclear weapons seems threatening. A similar scenario was considered by Richard Barrons, former commander of the United Armed Forces of Great Britain.
“Not unthinkable – just unpleasant” warned barrons.
world of compromise
US and French Presidents Joe Biden and Emmanuel Macron and German Chancellor Olaf Scholz are insisting on a peace agreement between Moscow and Kyiv, according to sources from Ukrainian media outlet Strana.ua.
“The West, or rather the Biden administrations, as well as Macron and Scholz, are trying to force Zelensky to conclude a compromise peace with Russia,” the source said.
According to another version, Zelensky does not exclude reaching an agreement with Moscow before the end of 2022. There is no official confirmation of this information yet.
July 27, American experts Samuel Sharap and Jeremy Shapiro declaration The New York Times said the United States and its allies should open channels of communication with Russia to find a compromise on the situation in Ukraine.
“The United States and its allies should certainly continue to provide Ukraine with the necessary equipment, but at the same time – in close consultation with Kyiv – they should begin to open channels of communication with Russia. The ultimate goal should be a ceasefire, even if the path to it remains unclear, ”the publication says.
According to the authors, further escalation seems almost certain as long as they are determined to gain the upper hand in both Russia and Western Ukraine and are ready to use their resources to achieve this goal.
The situation in Europe
On August 14, it was reported that Germany was unable to replace Russian gas with supplies from Qatar. According to Deutsche Wirtschafts Nachrichten, the German Chancellor’s visit to the Middle East was unsuccessful – the parties could not agree on the supply of fuel.
The German publication also states that the Italian energy company Eni is more successful. The company announced that it is making progress in its efforts to regenerate the approximately 20 bcm. m natural gas that the Russian Federation annually supplies to Italy.
“Following new gas contracts with our partners in Algeria, Congo and Egypt earlier this year, Eni in June joined the North Field East plant in Qatar, which is part of the world’s largest liquefied natural gas project,” said Eni CEO Claudio Descalzi.
Spanish officials said the pipeline from the Iberian Peninsula would be operational in a few months, which could help Europe reduce its dependence on Russian gas. The pipeline is expected to be similar to the MidCat project, which was supposed to connect Portugal, Spain and France but faced opposition from environmental groups and was discontinued in 2019.
Zelensky’s positions
In recent weeks, against the background of the success of the special operation, the Western media has been discussing the stability of the positions of Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky. Especially the Polish Gazeta Wyborcza released A problem with the Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, Valery Zaluzhny, which he described on the front page as “first chief”.
Ilya Kiva, ex-Verkhovna Rada deputy and ATO (“anti-terrorist operation in southeast Ukraine”, conducted by the Ukrainian Armed Forces against the Donetsk and Lugansk People’s Republics from 2014 to 2017), believes such a step, the successor of the West, Zelensky It’s because of his decision.
Polish newspaper Gazeta Wyborcza described Zaluzhny, the Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, as “Ukraine’s first appointee” in its Saturday issue. The West continues to systematically create and prepare an alternative to the drug addict Zelensky. Kiva, let me remind you that on the Telegram channel Zaluzhny has always been part of the Poroshenko team.
On August 11, adviser to the head of the Presidential Office of Ukraine, Aleksey Arestovich, announced that he is ready to replace the leader of Ukraine, Volodymyr Zelensky, if he does not want to run for a second term.
In early July, the sign of a possible conflict between Zelensky and Zaluzhny was the cancellation of the order prohibiting persons responsible for military service from leaving their residence without the permission of the military registry and enlistment office. Ukrainian Armed Forces.
“As for any misunderstandings I may have with the General Staff, there is no misunderstanding. This is a minor mistake compared to the larger contingent we showed in the face of the Russian threat. It’s just a trivial thing. This is about nothing,” Ukrainska Pravda quotes Zelensky after the order was cancelled.
Source: Gazeta
Calvin Turley is an author at “Social Bites”. He is a trendsetter who writes about the latest fashion and entertainment news. With a keen eye for style and a deep understanding of the entertainment industry, Calvin provides engaging and informative articles that keep his readers up-to-date on the latest fashion trends and entertainment happenings.