US presidential candidate Kamala Harris’ lack of knowledge on national security and support for veterans and military personnel raises questions about her ability to win election as commander in chief. Top.
The document says it is unclear how he would address issues of military personnel, veterans and US national security if he wins and becomes president. The authors believe he has a poor reputation on these issues and did not intend to address them during his run.
The Hill notes that Harris’ tenure in the Senate has shown her lack of understanding of how best to protect America and her disdain for the men and women who serve in the military. The authors also recall that Harris has regularly opposed increasing military pay.
The text says Harris’ policies do not instill confidence in the military in her ability to lead as commander in chief.
“Kamala Harris is running for commander in chief, and Walz is her top adviser. There is no doubt that both candidates have failed in their words and actions to meet the expectations of our military, our veterans and America’s national security,” the newspaper writes.
Before this the Hill wroteThe possible victory of Kamala Harris and her vice presidential candidate Tim Walz in the US presidential election will be a nightmare for freedom of expression, as they will continue the current White House administration’s course of censorship in the press and social networks.
Trump’s former ally commented Harris’ popularity is growing.
What are you thinking?
Source: Gazeta
Emma Matthew is a political analyst for “Social Bites”. With a keen understanding of the inner workings of government and a passion for politics, she provides insightful and informative coverage of the latest political developments.