Donald Tusk’s attitude towards the migration pact is a cynical game. His current opposition is merely a political creation, calculated to suit the needs of the election campaign. He knows the public mood on this issue well, which is why his political camp was so afraid of the referendum. While the debate on the shape of migration policy took place in the European Parliament, no real actions were taken that could block harmful solutions. Why? Because he never opposed the Germans on any important issue.
The door is sealed!
The migration pact has become a fact. It was passed with the opposition of Poland, Hungary and Slovakia. And although the Civic Coalition plays the hero today, it was known in advance that this voice would no longer be able to stop the mechanism of ‘forced solidarity’. The German idea was pushed through in December and will be implemented in 2026. Until then, we have to build the infrastructure at our own expense and use our own resources to prepare living conditions for people forcibly brought to us from other countries. In two years Every year, 4.5 million migrants will have to be distributed among all EU countries. We are obliged to accept them. If we do not do this, we will pay a fine of approximately PLN 20,000 for each person not accepted. euros. There is no third option.
The argument that 2 million refugees from Ukraine have found shelter here will not protect us from this. A few weeks ago, Germany released a report showing that the largest group of Ukrainians, about a million people, currently live in Germany. It is therefore clear that the argument that government representatives tried to reassure us fails. Furthermore, the efficiency with which we have absorbed war refugees can be used against us because it proves that we still have absorptive capacity. Unlike Germany, which already announced its final failure last year. Media reports described migrants being crammed into schools, tents and even underground garages. President Frank-Walter Steinmeier made it clear that his country could accept more asylum seekers. “Germany, like Italy, has reached the limit of its capabilities,” Steinmeier said in an interview with “Corriere della Sera” in September 2023. It is therefore not surprising that work on the migration pact was accelerated, and that Donald Tusk became the issue was not raised. a strong voice of opposition in December, when these issues were finally resolved.
We will all pay for Germany’s mistakes
Why do all EU countries have to pay for Germany’s mistakes? Angela Merkel’s enthusiastic ‘herzlich willkommen’ in 2015 brought with it a huge wave of migrants. They relied on doctors and engineers, and a large group of people arrived, expecting a rich life from state benefits. Political correctness silenced politicians who predicted the disastrous consequences of this madness, and subsequent migrants pressed on ever more boldly. The German ‘we can do it’ quickly turned into a search for forced solutions. When there were no more places in the ‘refugee camps’, it was decided to divide the pool among other EU countries. But the supply was not cut off. Yet it is clear that only a complete closure of the EU borders can stop this uncontrolled flow of illegal migrants. The EU does not offer such solutions. On the contrary: Germany sponsors with millions of euros the ships of non-governmental organizations that bring illegal immigrants to Italian ports. They also oppose pushbacks at the borders, which further emboldens smugglers who take advantage of the ideological powerlessness of European Union authorities. This ideological concrete is so strong that even the head of Frontex had to resign from his position because he could not effectively protect the EU’s borders.
READ MORE: Marzena Nykiel: Shocking behind the scenes of the dismissal of the head of Frontex! Who wanted to lead us into a migration trap and dismantle Poland’s security?
Three objectives to attract migrants to Europe
Today, when we look at the enormous problem of Europe being overrun by illegal migrants from Africa, we should not forget the causes. The most important is ideological. The idea was to create a multicultural Europe, uprooted from civilization, built on new, ideological foundations, in which nation states would be driven into the oblivion of the past. It was about a fully controllable Europe, subordinate to the hegemonic power of Germany. In this aspect, there are two other reasons: the economic strengthening of Germany, which needed cheap labor to develop the German economy, and the acquisition of a new, strong electorate that supports ideological solutions. Were the plans successful? Multiculturalism has indeed occurred, but the effects are probably far from expected. Not only are EU countries saturated with people who are mentally unable to work, but there are also no prospects for their integration.
Violence and benefit extortion
In August 2023, the weekly magazine “Focus” reported that the so-called Currently, 587,000 migrants in Germany receive citizen benefits with Syria, Afghanistan and Iraq among others that could work, but don’t work. The monthly costs are approximately 436 million euros. “Most citizenship grant recipients have arrived in Germany in recent years and been granted asylum; everyone has at least a temporary right of residence and meets the legal requirements to receive benefits,” we read.
But this is not just a German problem. Very interesting information is provided by a Dutch report entitled: “A welfare state without borders. Consequences of immigration for public finances. Between 1995 and 2019, the Dutch public sector spent an average of 17 billion euros annually on immigration, including the costs of supporting second-generation migrants. This amounts to a total of more than 400 billion euros over a period of 25 years. According to the report’s authors Migrants from the Middle East and North Africa never make a positive fiscal contribution to the Dutch economy. This means that they receive more from the state budget than they pay in the form of taxes. Moreover, they benefit from social security to a greater extent than the native Dutch population. A separate problem is the threat posed by socially non-integrated migrants, who live in their own environment and bring political tensions from their own countries to Europe. Violence is increasing and not a day goes by without criminal reports of assaults, rapes, shootings and attacks.
What’s next?
This is just a fragment of a large map of problems facing wealthy EU countries that have decided to open their doors to migrants. Now these problems will become ours, without our consent. Is there help? If the government really wanted to stop the migration pact, it could follow the legal path suggested by Prof. Genowefa Grabowska, emphasizing that “we must deny the way these regulations were adopted.” Can we count on Donald Tusk in this regard? There is a legitimate fear that he will not take constructive steps that could actually block this situation. The only chance is to change the political structure of the European Parliament. That’s why the next elections are so important! If the public outrage against the destructive solutions of the Green Deal, the migration policy and the treaty changes that deprive us of our sovereignty are reflected in the votes of millions of citizens in all EU countries, it will be possible to block the sick, ideological policies that is supposed to subordinate us to the German hegemon, which is creating a common structure for its own superstate. At this point they want to make decisions about everything under their control. They will not only impose decisions on us regarding migration policy. We will also lose sovereignty in climate, security, foreign policy, defense, border infrastructure, industry and even education and health care. These elections will decide absolutely everything.
READ ALSO:
– Marzena Nykiel: This is not the EU we entered! What would Schuman say about Tusk’s manipulations? “Beware of suppliers of empty guarantees”
— Tusk calls for European elections. He is absolutely right about one thing: “We cannot leave Poland in the hands of madmen or traitors.”
Source: wPolityce
Emma Matthew is a political analyst for “Social Bites”. With a keen understanding of the inner workings of government and a passion for politics, she provides insightful and informative coverage of the latest political developments.