“We have seen what the last election campaign actually was. PO didn’t actually have any substantive discussions, it was just kind of hate speech. Pablo Morales is the face of this campaign,” said Prof. in an interview with wPolityce.pl. Hanna Karp. A member of the National Broadcasting Council, Prof. Karp also commented on today’s words from Madam. Sienkiewicz, who stated that he “does not interfere with the politics of trustees”, and that the liquidation of the public media itself is an apparent action, because it involves restructuring.
The Wirtualna Polska portal wrote yesterday that the Civic Platform has paid PLN 305,000 over the past eight years. PLN for hater activities. According to WP’s findings, the person posing as Pablo Morales operated two accounts. At the same time, he promoted platform politicians and attacked the party’s opponents, especially Szymon Hołownia. This is the opinion of media expert Prof. in an interview with the wPolityce.pl portal. Hanna Karp, this case is nothing compared to what the coalition of Tusk and Sienkiewicz are doing in the media and in Poland in general.
The Morales case, in the context of what this government is doing, what we see in the media, in the context of the invasion of the presidential palace to arrest PiS politicians, seems like a marginal case. And yet, funding a hater, a person who hides behind an appropriate nickname, whose job it is to discredit the entire community, is outrageous
– Prof. told us Hanna Karp pointed out that this way of acting of politicians shows their thinking style.
This indicates the type of thinking of those who made decisions about Morales’ actions. This seriously spoils the public debate and lowers the level of the campaign. We have seen what the last election campaign actually was. PO didn’t actually have any substantive discussions, it was just kind of hate speech. Pablo Morales is the face of this campaign, he is a symbol of the times we have behind us. Unfortunately, we cannot say that it will be better or even different, on the contrary
– summarizes a member of the National Broadcasting Council. Although the case seems closed, more election campaigns await us.
I wonder what political instruments will be used to fight the opponent. After all, we have a local government campaign ahead of us, and then a campaign in connection with the European Parliament elections. What is the face of the Civic Platform and its politicians? What methods do they use? This is what the case of Morales illustrates
– said Prof. in an interview with the wPolityce.pl portal. Carp.
The public needs to know that there are certain types of entities for hire and that they receive a lot of money. Their job is to spread hate and escalate emotions. And it was PO that hated the party, but not just its satellite parties. To this must be added the support of major commercial media, because it is difficult to talk about any objectivity here
– summarized Prof. Hanna Karp.
READ ALSO: Jacek Ozdoba against Szymon Hołownia in the Sejm: Do you feel like an idiot, a clown, an idiot? It was Tusk who had to pay the man who hated
Sienkiewicz as Baron Münchhausen
Prof. Kanna Karp has responded with the following words for the wPolityce.pl portal: Bartłomiej Sienkiewicz, who said in Polsat News that he “does not interfere with the policy of liquidators” and that the liquidation is actually an apparent action because it involves restructuring . According to Prof. Karper situation min. Sienkiewicz becomes unenviable. He found no support in the courts for the imaginary liquidation of the public media.
Min. Sienkiewicz begins to realize what a quagmire he finds himself in and how the famous Baron Münchhausen tries to grab his hair and pull himself out of the quagmire he finds himself in. To grab him by the hair of the reality he himself created. It seems to me that this will no longer be possible
– ironizes Prof. Karp, however, immediately adds that the illegal path of apparent liquidation of the public media, which Sienkiewicz has chosen, leads to criminal liability.
Liquidation and restructuring are two different activities. False liquidation is an act to the detriment of public media companies. Fake liquidation carries significant fines, in accordance with relevant regulations. Min. Sienkiewicz is now the face of such sham activities, and we know what his actions were aimed at. First, he was concerned about personnel changes in the public media
– emphasizes the member of the National Broadcasting Council and explains why Sienkiewicz needed liquidation.
When the first move proved ineffective, liquidation was announced. First on major TVP and Polish radio, and then in regional centers. Min. Sienkiewicz and everyone who accompanies him in his efforts, be it the curator Daniel Gorgosz or the current neo-president of TVP, find themselves in an increasingly difficult situation.
Now Sienkiewicz is wondering how to get out of the whole situation.
Sienkiewicz wants to complete his ‘butcher’s work’, as he called it, in May, so I heard. That is, finish the most brutal part, and then Sienkiewicz plans to move on to another episode. This will probably be the European Parliament
– said Prof. Hanna Karp. She also responded to Sienkiewicz’s threats to sue the National Broadcasting Council for depositing subscription payments into a court deposit instead of transferring them to TVP or Polish Radio.
The National Broadcasting Council receives various types of correspondence, including attempted harassment, complaints, and lawsuits. This is all illegal. The National Broadcasting Council will certainly not be intimidated
– she decided emphatically.
READ ALSO:
– What hypocrisy! Sienkiewicz: I don’t get involved in the politics of liquidators. The minister should not worry about the operation of the public media
— The court’s justification for not including the trustees of TVP and PR in the register of the National Court crushes Sienkiewicz. The government is aware that it is acting illegally
koala
Source: wPolityce