The media in the West certainly favors the left, or the so-called liberals who, despite their self-proclaimed mania, have nothing to do with freedom. The political leanings of most media people – journalists and show business people – are obvious, but the extent of prejudice and the degree of detachment from the views of society at large is continually astonishing. In Poland it will be just like in the West: state, corporate and individual censorship caused by fear.
Dubois attacks the Szczecin prosecutor’s office: “The statement contains an attempt at manipulation.” In the background the Grodzki case
Hakuna, or the face of the new evangelization. The greatest phenomenon in the life of the Catholic Church in Spain in the 21st century
Sex scandal in “Gazeta Wyborcza”. Jabłoński asks Bodnar: “Will there be an investigation and charges against Kącki?” The internet storm continues!
The American Media Research Center (MRC) conducted an analysis of political entertainment programs such as talk shows (something like Wojewódzki’s, but almost exclusively about politics. Sometimes in a broader sense: social, cultural, climate policy, etc.). 6 most important so-called late night shows (broadcast late in the evening to end and summarize the day) from the biggest stations: “Jimmy Kimmel Live!” from ABC “The Daily Show” from Comedy Central, “Late Night with Seth Meyers” and “The Tonight Show Starring Jimmy Fallon” from NBC, “The Late Show with Stephen Colbert” and “The Late Late Show with James Corden” from CBS station.
Those who conducted the analysis devoted themselves to it and, with a superhuman effort of will, watched 9,518 political jokes and jokes made in these programs from January to mid-December 2023. Can you imagine this ordeal – view almost 10,000. jokes like Wojewódzki, Pacześ or someone else? A whopping 81% of these jokes (7,729) were identified as targeting conservatives, Christians and people from the right wing of political views. In other words, the largest television stations in the United States mock and mock the right wing at least four times more often than they do the left wing or so-called liberals.
Ridiculing someone from a social group is never neutral, and that’s exactly what we want, because it’s impossible to do otherwise. Nevertheless, this difference in messages may seem shocking to naive people who believe that the media in the West are impartial, somehow objective, or serve the whole of society and would like to hold them up as an example. The best-known examples are the long-biased BBC and the far-left CNN. It is worse than in Poland, although soon our country will resemble the long-awaited West.
There are no proportions that take into account the views of the entire population. America, regardless of election results, is fairly evenly divided: one half consists of Republicans who are more or less conservative, and the other half consists of Democrats with smaller or far left deviations. In any case, the right wing will be mocked and ridiculed four times more often.
Conservatives, especially white men with normal sexual preferences, are the only social group that can be mocked. The right and conservatives are constantly sucking up the so-called liberals have gotten themselves into a state where they are hostages of the obsessed, perpetually blackmailing left, they are dependent on their moods and whims. Joking about LGBTWC ideology is career-ending, even in right-wing media. The opportunistic management will wash its hands, throw the victim off the sledge, just to avoid offending the ideologically excited left, but also all those boring, predictable TV stars with their trivial, superficial views – depending on what the current fashion brings.
Each of these 6 analyzed programs attracts approximately 1.5 – 2 million TV viewers, but their reach is obviously much larger because fragments are shown in different bands and very intensively in online media. The presenters are big TV stars who earn as much as those from Hollywood. They have a significant influence on Americans’ political views. It’s almost a miracle that, with such an overwhelming left-wing advantage in the media, Republicans still have half the readership.
Even greater disproportions are visible with direct political involvement. An analysis of payments into the accounts of political parties and committees shows that as much as 94% of donations from media people go to Democrats, 5% to Republicans and the remaining cents to other political entities.
Research from the universities of Copenhagen and Geneva shows that there are six times more feminist workers in European media newsrooms than the average in the population. The same goes for believers in climateism. However, there are on average three times fewer people with conservative views in the media than in society.
Roughly speaking, we are 18 times more likely to encounter content in the media that praises feminism than those that see it as an anachronistic, grotesque movement destructive to social and even family relationships. For example, someone who thinks that the idea of gender quotas is stupid, unfair, harmful and degrading to dignity must feel alone in their views. He finds them so strange and isolated that he not only dares to protest, but even dares to express them in any way. And this is also the goal of the left-leaning media that monitors this attitude. It is not just about enforcing certain views, but also about completely discouraging the expression of your own views.
This gap between the views of the elites and the general public is so great that the rulers and owners of the world do everything they can to hide it, to drown out what they don’t like. Hence, among others, official state censorship in Germany, France, Great Britain, etc. In the United States, where the First Amendment to the Constitution on freedom of expression is still in force, censorship only applies at the corporate level – for example Facebook regulations, guidelines at Disney, universities, etc.
Censorship in Poland
Tusk’s government wants to introduce censorship in Poland. This was announced by Minister Kotula, who will push for the inclusion of provisions on so-called hate speech based on gender and sexual orientation. These rules are nothing but censorship. The point is to make it impossible to criticize Kotula’s ideas about introducing censorship, which are stupid and bad for democracy and freedom of belief, without the risk of being accused of gender-based hatred, because Kotula is a woman . In the same way, you have to admire Biedron and Śmiszek for being gay. So let’s mock them, let’s mock conservatives like American channels do, until they put us in jail for it, as Śmiszek would like.
And Marek Rutka, who, as a left-wing delegate to the National Media Council, probably had some kind of genetic memory. This Lilliputian killer wants journalists to be held criminally liable for spreading what he considers disinformation or any such hate speech.
Programs that spread hatred, but also use manipulation and lies, should not be spread. I am convinced that sooner or later the authors of these programs will be held criminally liable for spreading disinformation and untruths.
Rutka said in Polsat.
Just like during communism and Jaruzelski’s junta. The difference is that now a number of hired, self-appointed guardians of views, such as informant organizations such as a fraudster-set up observatory, will ensure that the report reaches the right prosecutor.
The biggest obstacle to the suppression of freedom of expression is of course the media on the Internet and the citizens who publish there whatever they want, hence the introduction of censorship there. The network is cross-border, so censorship alone in individual countries is not very effective. That is why the Eurocrats want to establish it at EU level. So we will continue to play a game with murderers who hate freedom of speech.
The EU shuts down the system with censorship. Eurocrats threaten to fine the largest social media for publishing unlawful content
There are several things and phenomena that swallows can remind us of and give us hope for. Societies in the West are so fed up with ideological stimulation and political correctness that they are starting to feel surrendered. How many more sweet-farting homosexuals can we squeeze into the show? For companies like Disney, a world champion in driving ideological stimulation – woke and LGBT ideology, whatever – 2023 brought nothing but disaster. Every production is a flop. Viewers and customers vote with their feet and eyes. They leave, they turn away.
All this, all this supposedly cool left-wing, liberal propaganda, can no longer be tolerated soberly. It takes a special brain to put up with this, so it’s no wonder that major TV stars who so boldly mock white, conservative, normal men lose their audience. 2 million viewers in a country with 330, or perhaps 350 million inhabitants (it is suspected that there are 20 million illegal immigrants) is not an impressive result.
Instead, it is acquired by online creators who are not burdened by the burdens of large media companies that make deals with governments and are often truly independent. Hence, for example, the phenomenon of conservative Tucker Carlson, who was recently linked to Fox News, and whose views on the war in Ukraine are unfortunately stupid and despicable. Let’s leave it.
On American channels we will not hear a joke about the demented President Biden, who has completely lost touch with reality, or about his son Hunter, a promiscuous drug addict. We will not hear from Polish correspondents from Radio Zet, RMF, TVN, Wyborcza, etc. the truth about this family and what American democracy looks like. That is why it is even more important to follow media such as the wpolityce portal, Wpolscee television or the weekly magazine Sieci, which represent values that represent almost half of Poles, but will be judged by their honor and faith and will be destroyed by the lounge. We will protect freedom of expression, including ridicule and ridicule.
Source: wPolityce