Article 64, paragraph 2, of the organic regulations of the Provincial Council of Alicante states that “no motion or institutional declaration discussed or put to vote on the same subject may be submitted before the lapse of nine months.” That is why the people’s group in the provincial institution had to withdraw the motion on “Defense of citizenship”. spanish constitution“Equality of Spaniards and respect for the rule of law and democracy,” he said, aiming for an amnesty for Catalan independence politicians and agreements at the December ordinary general assembly meeting to be held next Monday after this week’s holidays. It allowed Pedro Sánchez to take office as Head of Government.
The issue of amnesty was also discussed at the previous general assembly meeting. State Palace At the beginning of October, that is, according to the legislation, we will have to wait until mid-2024 for this issue to be discussed again. The motions to be discussed are those submitted by the groups PSPV-PSOE and Compromís, which deal respectively with problems related to administrative assistance to local organizations at risk of depopulation in municipalities and the implementation of the Plan Planifica. In this last case, it is worth remembering that in the proposal submitted by the Valencian coalition, the budget implementation rate of the Provincial Assembly at the end of the third quarter was around 33%.
Repeat
The popular group’s aim is to repeat a debate similar to the one at the plenary meeting on October 3, when PP and PSPV MPs clashed as they argued over amnesty and agreements with the independence movement. ., as well as doing so on what has been one of the County Council’s biggest businesses in recent years. Municipal Cooperation Fund. On this occasion, it was the people’s group that submitted a motion to the provincial body to demonstrate against “payment of the political price demanded by the independence movement”; this proposal resulted in an upvote from Vox, despite PP not doing so. It would include two amendments proposed by the ultras and opposition from PSPV and Compromís.
Bringing the issue of amnesty to the general assembly meetings of different local governments follows the national guidelines imposed by the PP. The proof of this is, for example, the discussions that have taken place so far. Municipal councils of Alicante, Elche and Valencia or in the Provincial Council of Castellón. Many of these sessions were characterized by an angry tone, as in Elche, where both the PP and Vox condemned the amnesty and compared it to a dictatorship. Elche’s mayor, the popular Pablo Ruz, argued that this discussion was taking place within the City Council because it was “part of the State”. Catalonia was also the protagonist of the plenary meeting held by the Alicante City Council last week, where Pedro Sánchez emphasized the ordinary general assembly split of the agreements he made with the Catalan parties and debt forgiveness.
Faced with these situations, Greek Ombudsman Ángel Luna, in his speech at the last Municipality Forum organized by INFORMACIÓN, gave a slap on the wrist to local governments by condemning the waste of municipal resources to organize plenary sessions. amnesty. The regional ombudsman considers that these sessions deal with national issues that are outside the competence of municipal councils. «Politicians are polarized and this is serious. Mayors and council members must be busy with other things and cannot waste the resources they are given to solve neighbors’ problems,” Luna added.
Whatever slap on the wrist Síndic de Greuges receives, the Provincial Council’s regulations do not allow the grassroots group to fulfill their request to hold a discussion on amnesty in the provincial body next week. The popular ones had to withdraw the motion submitted by the first vice president, Ana Serna, in which the motion was “rejected”. Amnesty Law.
For its part, the PSPV motion would state that: Committee Municipalities, especially those with smaller populations, provide the means to meet the necessary services. Finally, Comprom’s proposal aims to ensure that the state agency commits to creating an economic allocation for the hiring of personnel who will improve implementation.