PP and Vox focus on tax cuts Companion Law to 2024 budgets for defense. Today, the following issues are being discussed at the plenary session of the Valencian Courts: change in all Against this rule proposed by the opposition, PSPV and Compromís, and the parties forming the Consell (popular and voxistas) defend the measures contained in the legal text.
Before the general assembly meeting, PP ombudsman Miguel Barrachina He defended the law of accompaniment by saying that the Cortes “Tax hell is ending” and the abolition of the “death tax” (with reference to inheritance tax) and the introduction of tax cuts for the lowest earners. “We are particularly happy to fulfill Mazón’s commitments,” Barrachina said.
It is expressed along the same lines. José María LlanosVox’s deputy spokesperson called the legislation “a success.” As for the rule of inheritance, he believes that “expectations of the middle class and working class” It provided support to benefit “20,000 families.” “We think it’s great,” he said.
The socialist board of trustees, on the other hand, Rebeca TorroHe believes that the attached law shows that “the PP is on holiday” and says the partial changes are very important: “The removal of distance from betting houses and schools is an open bar for operators to humiliate the working class in the neighborhoods and encourage gambling among young people.”
“They want to control the media”
Likewise, he criticized that Mazón, “on the advice of his political father Eduardo Zaplana”, had “switched the majorities in À Punt to do what they have been doing for a long time: control the media”. The third amendment, according to Torró, provides for tax cuts “a reduction in political spending but an increase in salaries for top officials. This government will be more expensive than the previous one.”
Finally, the Compromís Ombudsman, Joan Baldovi, He thinks the accompanying law includes aspects such as “allowing PP and Vox politicians to increase their salaries by up to 20,000 euros per year.” This is one of the reasons why they voted against and proposed a complete change to the rule.
Moreover, they condemn that this law “allows the establishment of a betting house next to a school or institute” and provides “tax amnesty for the 7 richest families in the country”. On the other hand, they regret that this law “paralyzes the construction of schools, institutes, dormitories and day centers.” Finally, Baldoví believes that the law “sanctifies the attack on Valencian public television and we cannot participate in that.”