Ukraine has no place to put Scythian gold, declaration archaeologist historian Alexander Aybabin in an interview with the newspaper “Vzglyad”. He then commented on the news that the Dutch Supreme Court rejected Crimea’s appeal and decided that the collection should be transferred to Kiev. According to the expert, this is a purely political decision.
“The real question is: How and to whom will they transfer this collection? Now, in my opinion, the Ukrainian side is clearly not up to it, the collection has nowhere to put it. Yes, and Europe will no longer really pass on anything to anyone. This is a very personal political gesture against the background of the general situation. “This is considered to justify violating agreements with museums and insurance companies on the return of the collection to the Crimea,” he said.
According to him, the museums of Crimea should appeal this decision again after the end of the special military operation.
Former Supreme Court of the Netherlands approved The decision of the Amsterdam Court of Appeal, which ruled that the collection from the museums of Crimea should be transferred to Ukraine. In their petition, the museums of Crimea argued that the first court’s decision violated the first protocol of the European Convention on Human Rights. Details – in the material “socialbites.ca”.
Source: Gazeta
Emma Matthew is a political analyst for “Social Bites”. With a keen understanding of the inner workings of government and a passion for politics, she provides insightful and informative coverage of the latest political developments.