In the new issue of “Sieci”, Marek Pyza and Marcin Wikło discuss the subject of Agnieszka Holland’s upcoming film “Green Border”. It will be a story of hate, which left-wing activists and the Netherlands itself see in the consistent work of the Polish services, which immerse the state’s resistance to the controlled influx of migrants in the sauce of pre-war racism and anti-Semitism, journalists write.
Current articles available through Friends Network subscription.
In the article “On bad Poles and good strangers” Marek Pyza and Marcin Wikło note that Agnieszka Holland’s films are productions that cannot be ignored. They are widely commented on and evoke many emotions. She is currently working on a new production. “Green Border” tells the story of Asian refugees reaching the Polish border. One of the leading roles in Holland’s new film is played by Maja Ostaszewska, an actress who is not only perfectly prepared in terms of content, but also ideologically to tackle this subject.
He has been experiencing the events at the border for two years now. He goes there with other activists, organizes show conferences. We learn from them about the misfortune of people whom the Polish services supposedly do not want to help. She posted many videos on social media, swearing and swearing at Poland. In one of them, together with Janina Ochojska and retired generals, Waldemar Skrzypczak and Mirosław Różański (advisor of Szymon Hołownia), she dramatically pleaded for humane treatment of refugees (although they are migrants, not refugees) and asked border guard officers whether awareness of what purpose they serve: “What are these orders that prevent us from helping?” In fact, it was a plea for disobedience
– write columnists of the weekly “Sieci”.
Columnists ask an important question about Agnieszka Holland’s goal. Does she really care about the well-being of people fleeing their country? Or maybe it’s about telling the public an imaginary fear of refugees and racism?
The director takes on the role of a demiurge, able to shape the societies of Western civilization in his own way. He reaches for the tone of a mentor, or even a national, European and global therapist. Who is Agnieszka Holland to usurp the right to be the conscience of Poland, whose traditional values are so offensive? Where does this belief that someone has been given a special role come from? Another accusation has yet to be brought against her, perhaps the most serious: equating the situation of Ukrainian refugees escaping Russian bombs with the artificially created migration wave in Minsk and Moscow of people who came to Europe at their own request and before coming to moved to Europe. the Polish border, often spent a long time in Russia, is still unknown for what purpose. It is false, thoroughly unfair and even disgusting towards Ukrainians
– indicate Pyza and Wikło.
“We will win this war”
In an interview (“Ultimately, we will win this war”), Jacek Karnowski asks Prof. Mieczysław Ryba, historian and political scientist, academic lecturer at the Catholic University of Lublin about Saint John Paul II. The scientist notes that…
The suitcase has many dimensions. On the one hand there are elections, on the other hand there is a political battle going on – strategic, cultural and civilization issues […]. Looking at the election results, it is clear that the biggest loser in the whole John Paul II row is the Civic Platform, ie the part of the camp closer to the center, not to the extremes. Such a collision helps the left […].
The historian also draws attention to the importance of the Women’s Strike. He argues that Catholic circles have not clearly stated their opposition. underlined:
The response to the Black Marches was poor. There was no clear diagnosis that this time it is not just some adverse processes. That this is not an alleged dialogue with the liberal-left world, but that it is simply a great culture war. A war whose importance is unimaginable in a longer historical context. What is at stake is the survival of the nation as such, as a community.
The professor also talks about the left:
In the absence of an adequate answer, she decided that the time had come to fight the central battle that would decide everything. That it is possible to overthrow the main authority, namely the Polish Pope. Without overthrowing him […] it is impossible to finish the cultural revolution in Poland. It cannot be performed effectively.
“Leakage of classified documents
Marek Budzisz describes in the article “Leak of secret documents” how the case of the release of US analyzes resonated worldwide and caused an avalanche of comments among world politicians. There have also been several speculations.
In the United States, there is talk of serious losses for the secret services and intelligence services in connection with the leak, but in the Russian channels on the Telegram platform, you can encounter the opinion that it is in fact a carefully prepared and planned intelligence agency . operation aimed at misleading the Russians about the capabilities and intentions of the Ukrainian side before the expected offensive
we are reading.
Budzisz also questions the credibility of the released materials. As is often the case in such cases, facts are mixed with innuendo.
Lloyd Austin said at a press conference that they were edited and what was published was different from the originals. Sure, the Russians changed the slides on which US intelligence analysts rated their loss of life. Prepared, they inflate the casualty count on the Ukrainian side, reducing Russian losses. Yuri Ignat, a spokesman for the Ukrainian Air Force, commenting on the leak of US documents, said that in the current war, its psychological and informational dimension may be even more important than actions at the front. One of the Israeli newspapers even mocked the analytical skills of US intelligence, as one of the leaked documents contained the statement that the Mossad was urging representatives of the armed forces to become more involved in the anti-government protests taking place in Israel.
Also recommended are the articles by: Stanisław Janecki “Tusk’s Wonderful Plan”, Jan Rokita “Explosion of a wheat mine”, Konrad Kołodziejski “If you want peace, prepare for war”, Dariusz Matuszak “The opposition knows the Poles not”, Goran Andrijanic “Return from Hell”, Aleksandra Rybińska “Paper Tiger from the Seine”, Grzegorz Górny “Judas Rehabilitated”.
Also noteworthy is Dorota Łosiewicz’s conversation with Żaklina Skowrońska, a journalist and TVP Info reporter, author of the book “Kadencja w strzerzach. Behind the scenes of presidential travel” (“I dream of a trip to liberate Ukraine”).
In addition, the weekly also features commentary on current events by Krzysztof Feusette, Dorota Łosiewicz, Bronisław Wildstein, Andrzej Rafał Potocki, Marta Kaczyńska-Zielińska, Samuel Pereira, Alina Czerniakowska, Piotr Cywiński, Wiktor Świetlik and Andrzej Zybertowicz.
More in the new issue of the weekly magazine “Sieci”.
Articles from the current issue will be available online from April 17. as part of the Friends Network subscription. We also invite you to watch the TV broadcast wPolsce.pl.
Source: wPolityce