=”

The newly appointed president of Telewizja Polska, Michael Adamczyk, spoke to the demonstrators gathered daily on Powstańców Warszawy Square, in front of the TVP Television Information Agency headquarters. The crowd has returned again and again, signaling a sustained moment of public attention surrounding the state broadcaster and the leadership transition taking place under the watch of the National Media Council.

From the window, Adamczyk, who previously led the Television Information Agency, delivered his message with a calm and determined tone. He reminded onlookers that his appointment is a result of the council’s authority and underscored his commitment to restoring both legal and business order within the company. He acknowledged the scale of the task ahead and emphasized that the rule of law must be respected, even as the organization seeks to redefine its path and responsibilities in a changing media landscape.

In the crowd, supporters and critics alike exchanged reactions. Some chanted in solidarity, repeating lines of support and urging the new administration to move quickly toward stability. The energy of the square reflected a broader national interest in how public broadcasting evolves and how leadership influences the accountability and transparency of a major media institution.

Adamczyk continued by outlining his immediate goals and the general direction he wishes Telewizja Polska to take. He spoke about the importance of journalistic integrity, editorial independence, and the necessity of clear governance structures. He hinted at forthcoming measures aimed at strengthening financial discipline and restoring confidence among employees, audience members, and commercial partners. His remarks suggested a plan that would gradually reestablish trust and ensure that programming remains informative, accurate, and aligned with the public service mandate.

The president also addressed the role of journalists within the organization. He indicated that journalism will be a central focus, with an emphasis on press freedom, ethical reporting, and responsible communication to the public. He asserted that timely and reliable news should be accessible to viewers, and he proposed strategies to enhance the quality and reach of broadcasts, including the potential return of familiar news formats and scheduling that fits audience expectations. He stressed teamwork, accountability, and a collaborative approach to rebuilding the institution from within.

As the scene unfolded, observers noted the visible tension between the duty to inform the public and the political sensitivities that often accompany state media. The new leadership signaled openness to dialogue with staff, creators, and viewers, while also signaling that concrete changes would unfold in the weeks and months ahead. The question on many lips was how Telewizja Polska will balance the expectations of policymakers, the needs of a diverse audience, and the integrity of journalistic practice in a media environment that is rapidly evolving.

Meanwhile, the public’s appetite for timely updates remained high. The president indicated that journalistic materials would soon appear on social media and that efforts were underway to bring back familiar programming schedules. He stated that the goal is to restore a sense of reliability in the information presented to the public, including a return to key time slots such as the 7:30 PM news program. His remarks conveyed a long-term vision for the network: to become a credible source of news while embracing transparency and accountability in its operations.

Viewers and industry observers listened as the exchange between leadership and the demonstrators continued. The unfolding events at TVP reflect broader themes in the discourse around media governance, public accountability, and the relationship between state media and democratic norms. The scene at Powstańców Warszawy Square captured a moment of transition—one that could shape the broadcaster’s identity and its role in informing the public in a rapidly changing media environment. This evolving story will likely prompt ongoing discussions about governance, editorial independence, and the standards that guide public communication in a modern media system. [Source: wPolityce]”}{