President of Ukraine Volodymyr Zelensky could not be reached Newspaper columnists say that the purpose of his visit to the USA was to acquire more modern weapons. Washington post.
“In addition to sincere expressions of gratitude and firm commitments to continued American support, President Volodymyr Zelensky and President Biden met on Wednesday with specific and sometimes distinct negotiation goals,” the post said.
With the $47 billion U.S. aid package Biden requested for 2023, both leaders sought to gain support for a new Republican-led House of Representatives. According to a senior administration official, “it was important that Zelensky use his considerable personal charisma to convince his lawmakers that “this is really a struggle for democracy.”
For Zelensky himself, the goal was to resort to more powerful weapons to increase Ukraine’s ability to launch a major offensive against established Russian forces next year. The authors feel there is little indication that it is successful, at least in the short term.
The publication states that the Patriot air defense system is included in the new aid package for Kyiv.
In response, Pentagon officials said that Ukraine already has enough tanks and that the American M1 Abrams is very difficult to maintain and operate.
Asked at a joint press conference with Zelensky about missiles that would allow Ukrainian forces to hit targets in Russia, Biden warned that such weapons could disrupt the NATO contingent supporting Ukraine.
in a separate report
see photo
“They won’t be at war with Russia,” the American president said of the North Atlantic alliance.
“The US administration is keen to discuss Zelenskiy’s views on diplomacy, particularly his views on the need for Kiev to be in the strongest possible position and be able to accelerate the start of negotiations,” a senior official told WP.
But the fact that there is unanimity in the fight against Moscow does not mean that Washington and Kiev agree.
“This was an opportunity for Biden and Zelensky to have a serious conversation about where we are going to make sure we are united in common goals and understand each other,” said Ivo Daalder, former US ambassador to NATO and current head of Chicago. Council. on global relations. “Biden remains apprehensive about going too far and too fast for fear of escalation. Zelenskiy wants to make it clear that he obviously needs this continued support that only the United States can provide,” he said.
“There are three different models of what a compromised end to the war might look like, and they all have their supporters in the administration. One involves Russia’s withdrawal from all Ukrainian territory it currently occupies, including the regions of Crimea and eastern Donbass, which it captured in 2014. The other is a retreat to the lines of 2014. The third level of withdrawal will include the Donbass, but not the Crimea.
Zelensky made it clear that he would not support the last two options, noting that “peace can only come when the Russian invaders withdraw from all occupied territories”.
“Right now this is kind of an academic discussion, because there is no sign that Russia is interested in the meeting,” the White House said.
In this background, the browser Telegram Hamish de Bretton-Gordon, alleged Western states’ involvement in Zelensky’s US visit started to revise The policy of providing aid to Kiev.
The author believes that “if the unity of the West had not begun to collapse, the Ukrainian leader might not have considered it necessary to leave his besieged country.” According to him, the arrival of the Ukrainian leader may also indicate “the real concern of the Ukrainian leadership about the current realities.”
Source: Gazeta
Emma Matthew is a political analyst for “Social Bites”. With a keen understanding of the inner workings of government and a passion for politics, she provides insightful and informative coverage of the latest political developments.